That is one theory. It is not accepted by most theologians.
2006-07-04 12:48:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by carl l 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The "proof" you speak of is only a collection of folklore, and stories of a person similar to Jesus.
There is no "proof" proof of it, but tradition says that the apostle Thomas went to India, where he died in an untimely fashion.
In ancient Israel, the common way of burial was in cave-like structures because of all the rocky ground. After a year, the remains of the body were put into an urn and buried under ground. Christ's death is not questioned by authorities outside scripture, neither is the empty tomb. The question which is in dispute is "What happened to the body?" Christians answer this with the resurrection.
2006-07-04 20:13:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by frodo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know he survived the cross, that's what Christianity is all about. Or haven't you heard that, in India? But I'd like to hear the connection between Buddhism, and Christ. I wonder why he didn't mention the cross, or the Roman's to the ancient east-asians?
Click on my name, and that will take you to my questions/answers. You'll find a link to my 360, IM, etc. Send anything you have there. You may have something I've been looking for...go figure...
2006-07-04 19:55:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is the same "proof" that Jesus appeared to the Native Americans (according to the Book of Mormon).
We are dealing with faith here - there is no Proof that Jesus ever visited anywhere after he was crucified.
Christians believe that he rose from the dead and is in Heaven - But we would be the first to admit we can't prove it, other then the Bible. We believe it though, and that's all that matters.
2006-07-04 19:50:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by James R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know it, & I'm believing it. After all, when people were crucified, they broke their legs so they'd die by suffocation due to not being able to support themselves so they could breathe. Jesus's legs were NEVER broken, & he was only on the cross for a few hours, compared a couple of days for others. & the reason he was only on there for a few hours was because of the Jewish Sabbath Day, & according to ancient law, NO ONE was allowed to be crucified on that day. Also, if Jesus had died, they would've BURIED him (as in UNDERGROUND), & not put him into an above-ground tomb.
As far as him not broadcasting where he was & the fact that he was alive, why would he? He left Jerusalem so he wouldn't be persecuted (again) & REALLY left to die on the cross (again). It defies logic if he actually did stay in Jerusalem (& he DIDN'T) & got re-persecuted. He traveled through Turkey (& other regions) & eventually made his way to France with Mary Magdalene.
2006-07-04 19:59:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by SingingStar7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
God's Personality and the Law of Karma
"The law of Karma," explained Mohandas K. Gandhi, "is inexorable and impossible of evasion. There is thus hardly any need for God to interfere. He laid down the law and, as it were, retired." Gandhi found this disturbing.
On the other hand, the resurrection promise reveals that God has a deep interest in his creation. To bring a dead one back to life on a paradise earth, God has to know and remember everything about that person. God indeed cares for each one of us.—1 Peter 5:6, 7.
2006-07-04 19:55:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by studzywudzy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm proud of you. One more point for the team of not being ignorant! Oh the proof they want..It is called deep thinkg and understanding the eastern religions and their study of altered states of conciousness. The truth is easy to see if your looking for it. How about relating the biblical world into our world and maybe thing might start making sense. Things havent changed as much as you might think they have.
2006-07-04 19:50:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Corey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
" Christ in India " a documentary tracing the messiah's fabled travel to India.
2006-07-04 19:53:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard this before that he went to India. What proof do u have I'd be very interested.
2006-07-04 19:48:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by xoɟ ʍous 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's like we can write what ever we want to on this thing and expect people to believe it. What a wonderful world.
2006-07-04 19:48:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by elreybrown 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would love to see your proof. Interesting theory, but highly unlikely.
2006-07-04 19:47:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋