It's a shame to see that after 5 years of crusade against the terrorist Muslims, people still don't know the difference.
A mujahid is someone who fights to protect it's land and people. A soldier (goarmy.com anyone?)
Talibans is a cult of religious nuts. They started off as fighting for a Muslim state in Afghanistan which is fine like here in USA the law today is made under Christian laws (gay marriage anyone?) but once they got a hold of the power. They went nuts and started to made their own rules.
Most of their teachings didn't exactly followed Islam.
2006-07-04 06:59:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mesum 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Although neither are the pillars of society, I would say that the Taliban is the worse of the two. The Taliban is known in the Middle East as the most dangerous group of all... this, well before the World Trade Center bombings. Their treatment of women, as well as the despicable things they have done in wars such as between Taliban controlled Afghanistan and Iran (i.e., skinned people alive, chopped off their heads, raped and tortured, etc.) clearly show how truly ruthless these people are and have been for many years. The Mujaheddin are only marginally less ruthless.
2006-07-04 13:58:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Debbie M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are good in their literal meaning of the word; to be a mujahid is to be some one struggling against difficulties placed on you by others, or a Taliban, some one seeking the truth. In their practical sense, the mujaheddin were defensive soldiers in Afghanistan that defeated the Russians and are now in the police and military; being a Taliban is basically being a Kafir/Munafiq, a non-Muslim b/c it is not truth that is being sought, it is power and following the ignorant advice of paid agents.
2006-07-04 13:44:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ismael B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't U have 2 understand something B4 U know which is better?
Taliban means Edcuation/School
Mujahiddin means avenging force.
U'd think the Taiban would B the lesser of 2 evils, but they're not R they?
Both R as bad as each other.
2006-07-04 13:43:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Is a mistake. To find difference of better or worse. Ask those who are suffering for they thought that Mujahiddin might have been better.
2006-07-04 13:45:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by narotamdewan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Which is better Cow Crap or Horse Crap? Doesn't make much difference when someone holds a gun to your head, puts a spoon in your hand and says bone apatite
2006-07-04 13:46:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither - both are sets of religious beliefs and all religion is the source of disconcert and conflict between human beings.
Toodles.
Oh and to all of you above - on what are you basing your opinions??? Public executions??? and I assume you're a Christian??? wow - - - are we back to the crusades again??
2006-07-04 13:42:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by MarQus1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
any group, man, institution, or government whose primary goal is to deprive others of their basic right to life and happiness is not good. there isn't a lesser of two evis, either. both of these groups kill without compunction innocent people in order for their own percieved gain. all terrorist groups suck the big one.
2006-07-04 13:43:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by grumpy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We must seek out both organizations and totally destroy them. I suggest public execution as a warning to other upstarts.
2006-07-04 13:41:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
to me ... Mujahiddin .... ISLAM is not terrorizing ... but we will not stand still in the silence when innocent women and children have been raped and killed ... we wont just sit there and watch our friends and family killed for nothing ... wouldn't you do the same my fellow friends, if the same happen to you .... if u dont know nothing about it ... better not speak about it .... dont just believe CNN's craps ... open up your eyes... open up your heart ... peace be upon u
2006-07-04 13:49:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by deadman83 2
·
0⤊
0⤋