Unfulfill prophecy in Bible, one unfulfilled prophecy sufficient to prove Bible is rong I can give plenty?

Question

Genesis, Chapter No. 4, Verse No. 12, it says… ‘God told Cain: you will never be able to settle you will be a wanderer.’ Few Verses later on Genesis, Chapter No.4, Verse No.17, says…‘Cain built up a city’ – unfulfilled prophecy. If you read Jeremiah, Chapter No.36, Verse No.30, it says that…‘Jehoiachin the father of Jehoiachin… no one will be able to sit on his throne - The throne of David, no one will be able to sit after Jehoiachin.’ If you read later on, II Kings, Chapter No 24, Verse No 6, it says that… ‘Jehoiachin after he died, later on Jehoiachin sat on the throne’ - Unfulfilled prophecy. One is sufficient to prove it is not the word of God - I can give plenty. If you read Ezekiel, Chapter No 26, it says that…‘Nebuchader, he will destroyed Tyre.’ We come to know that Alexander the great, was the person who destroyed Tyre - Unfulfilled prophecy. SO think over it Bible is not the word of GOD, scientifically as well as if u think religiously, so accept the truth i.e. ISLAM

Answer 1

"For this reason he also gave the same name to the city which he built, inasmuch as its erection was another phase in the development of his family. The construction of a city by Cain will cease to surprise us, if we consider that at the commencement of its erection, centuries had already passed since the creation of man, and Cain's descendants may by this time have increased considerably in numbers; also, that does not necessarily presuppose a large town, but simply an enclosed space with fortified dwellings, in contradistinction to the isolated tents of shepherds; and lastly, that the words “he was building,” merely indicate the commencement and progress of the building, but not its termination.

"The Tyre spoken of by Ezekiel is not the city on the mainland, Old Tyre, which was taken by Shalmaneser and destroyed by Alexander, but Insular Tyre, which was three-quarters of a mile farther north, and only 1200 paces from the land, being built upon a small island, and separated from the mainland by a strait ."

""There shall not be to him one who sits upon the throne of David," i.e., he is not to have a son that shall occupy the throne of David after him. This does not contradict the fact that, after his death, his son Jehoiachin ascended the throne. For this ascension could not be called a sitting on the throne, a reign, inasmuch as he was immediately besieged in Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, and compelled to surrender after three months, then go into exile to Babylon. "

Nice try, no go. Now you want to talk contradictions, pull out the Koran, but we don't have enough space to dissect the book.

Answer 2

Correction: Yes, Javed, as you said in your email, I had read some of it wrong, but there still is no unfulfilled prophecy. Allow me to rephrase a little. I was wrong in rushing so much to answer, but the Bible is still right.

First one, in Genesis, building a city and giving it to his son doesn't mean that Cain himself settled there.

Second one: See BrotherMichael's answer.

Third one: Nebuchadnezzer captured the mainland city in 572 B.C. Alexander the Great destroyed the islands two centuries later.

Answer 3

All of the ""unfulfilled"" prophecies prove nothing.

I can write a book that includes all sorts of prophecies that are later fulfilled in that same book. As a matter of fact, there is a place in your local library with thousands of books like that, and they are in the FICTION section!

Answer 4

Why do you feel the need to disprove anything. All religions are based on faith , even Islam. Are you afraid?

Answer 5

You can interpret the Bible any you chose to. But do you really believe your statement or is someone else interpreting it for you.

Answer 6

There is NOT ONE fulfilled prophecy in the bible. It's all POSTDICTIONS, FORTUNATE COINCIDENCES, OR STRETCHING/COMPRESSING SCRIPTURES TO FIT REALITY.

Answer 7

they were dons guessing at the future cause it is fun to imagine.