2006-07-04 05:36:54 · 7 answers · asked by brittany p 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
When Murdoch was on the bridge that night, he made a split decision. He chose left, possibly because there was less ice on that side. Something made Murdoch turn left, so I believe that the ship would've collided no matter what. Whether it sank or not, no one will ever know, but the collision would occur no matter what.
2006-07-09 01:29:16 · answer #1 · answered by i_am_nathan_2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well history of the Titanic would be different, making it all the way to NY.
2006-07-04 05:40:03 · answer #2 · answered by Not_Here 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it wouldn't have mattered. By the time they saw the iceburg it was too late to turn either way. What they should have done was to listen to the reports that were given and had lookouts watching for iceburgs.
2006-07-04 05:41:11 · answer #3 · answered by David T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, not a chance. Probably would have gone down faster.
You have too much time on your hands to be pondering that. And so do I, for answering
John
2006-07-04 05:44:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - the turning circle was too narrow - They just might have survived a head-on crash, however, as the compartments might not have overflowed.
2006-07-04 05:41:29 · answer #5 · answered by limey_not_lime 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
proububly not becuase the iceburg was to big to get around
2006-07-04 05:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if a frog had wings would he still bump his butt every time he jumps?
2006-07-04 05:40:58 · answer #7 · answered by Pobept 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋