2006-07-04 03:00:23 · 9 answers · asked by jen r 1 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Infectious Diseases
Bad Idea!
DOn't!....
Wait til the mother is in remession at least for five years- then too, it is a roll of dice. Adopt!
2006-07-04 03:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by dude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The well being care service is your amazing source of information. If the mum has AML leukemia, her amazing probability of survival lies with chemotherapy and then a bone marrow transplant. She'd could be remoted contained in the well being facility in the course of the chemo because it in reality kills your immune equipment so that you'll reply extra acceptable to the bone marrow transplant (assuming a donor is accessible). She'll be susceptible for the time of that aspect to any viruses or micro organism that penetrate the isolation room, mutually with insects that her equipment would typically be solid adequate to wrestle off. yet she's youthful, that could help her possibilities of survival if she is going through with the chemo and transplant. The toddlers might want to not live to inform the tale, even if. What a nasty capture 22 situation! refer to the well being care service and ensure he's an expert on leukemia and its results of being pregnant.
2016-11-05 21:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
outside of the fact the mother has a deadly illness. the baby would get it from the genetics and blood from the mother. her having a child while having the illness as it causes the immune system to be much lower, could kill the mother from the stress of having the child and going through the pregnancy.
2006-07-04 03:05:31 · answer #3 · answered by hollywood71@verizon.net 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not a good idea.is she going to be ok? otherwise the baby will be left without a mother far too early
2006-07-04 03:05:19 · answer #4 · answered by grasshoppers_revenge 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not a good idea because the baby will be affected, definitely
2006-07-04 03:12:52 · answer #5 · answered by Innocent E 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not an infectious disease ,its a terminal illness ,and I dont think she would get pregnant anyway if she did it would get worse and any treatment you are undergoing at the time would kill the fetus
2006-07-04 03:15:28 · answer #6 · answered by dumplingmuffin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a good idea.
2006-07-04 03:02:41 · answer #7 · answered by 'Barn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it is not good you will have a 99% change she will not carry
2006-07-04 03:05:15 · answer #8 · answered by nightsky1331 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's the question?
2006-07-04 03:03:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋