Does anyone realize that Darwin himself said that he did not believe in evolution and that there was defiantly not enough information to prove that it was even remotely close to fact. If we really have evolved from "particles" that randomly were able to join together and create what is now a human being, where did those particles come from, and what caused the big bang if there was absolutely NOTHING out in "space."
2006-07-03 13:51:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
OK, so let's assume that the universe was already there, really how did it get there??? did it just appear out of no where? Pleas explain it to me. I really want to know. I'm not just doing this to ask a question and get lotss of responces, I want to know how if there was no creator, which there IS by the way, how everything came into existance.
2006-07-03 14:05:23 · update #1
Darwin Did state that evolution was just a theory, he may have tried to present it as fact but he never said that it was.
2006-07-03 14:20:44 · update #2
Sry this took so long, I've been out for a while and didn't have access to answers.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe/review.html
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp?aigHomeCountry=United+States&aigEvents=United+States&aigBookstore=United+States
2006-07-06 12:44:37 · update #3
THANK YOU. For once someone smart posts a GOOD point. Finally. Oh, by the way, I agree 100%.
2006-07-03 13:55:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What you said about Darwin is a lie, plain and simple. Evolution is a fact. The reason we know it's a fact is that there is overwhelming evidence of many different and independent kinds that no honest and informed person would deny.
As to the big bang, no-one claims that it came from absolutely nothing. Indeed, quantum mechanics suggests that the existence of 'absolutely nothing' is an impossibility, so it would be impossible for a creator to exist, since there would be no state of 'nothing' for him to create a 'something' from. All we can say for sure is that the universe exists, and invoking the idea of a deity to account for it has absolutely no explanatory value.
2006-07-03 20:59:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there is a creater, which there isn't, how did he come into existence? Did he create himself? How the universe came to be is a question that may never be answer; religion is just an idiotic solution. Microevolution has been 100% PROVEN. Macroevolution is a likely theory. And if Darwin didn't believe in evolution, why did he study it and present it as fact?
2006-07-03 21:15:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Universe has always been, it is on continuous space-time cycle. If you go along either of the lines far enough, you will arrive back to the same space or time. At the end of this universe, it basically reboots and starts over, for eternity.
2006-07-03 20:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by azmurath 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Learning From Creation
Have you marveled at the splendor of a brilliant, star-filled sky on a moonless night, seeing in it evidence of a Grand Maker? "The heavens are declaring the glory of God; and of the work of his hands the expanse is telling," exclaimed an ancient observer. "When I see your heavens, the works of your fingers, the moon and the stars that you have prepared," this man pondered, "what is mortal man that you keep him in mind, and the son of earthling man that you take care of him?"—Psalm 8:3, 4; 19:1.
Read the rest of this spiritually enlightening article right here!-->http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2000/8/22a/article_01.htm
2006-07-03 21:23:03 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The story that Darwin recanted his theory is a lie spread by the lowliest "Christians" who can no longer refute the truth of God's divine science.
Nice try, though.
2006-07-03 20:58:22 · answer #6 · answered by PALADIN 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you know that darwin waited 28 years before publishing what he observed on his trips around the world because he was afraid of being persecuted by religious types, but his friends urged him to do it cause they knew what he had discovered was real?
go to any public university and you will find no debate about whether evolution is happening. the debate is the mechanism of how it is happening!
2006-07-03 21:11:28 · answer #7 · answered by az geologist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If scientists were polled today, I believe the majority would not believe in the big bang or evolution. I believe the majority would not believe in creation either. They are searching for an alternative to creation, but they (majority) are not ready acknowledge it yet. The number of scientist who do believe in creation is growing.
2006-07-03 21:02:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
can u show some proof that Darwin actually didn't believe in evolution? because i find it hard to believe that he spent all his life studying something that he didn't believe.
i went to the link above and found this. it says that darwin nerver took back his belife in evolution read it if u dont belive me
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/darwin_recant.asp
2006-07-03 20:55:45 · answer #9 · answered by dracula1895 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this point in my life, I am neither a creationist nor an evolutionist. But I have often wondered that Big Bang in space question myself.
2006-07-03 20:56:38 · answer #10 · answered by rebekkah hot as the sun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep...good point. I like this website for information like this.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/darwin.asp
2006-07-03 20:55:31 · answer #11 · answered by bobm709 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋