I can't help but think it would have very positive effects. If nothing else, for that moment everyone would be one and share a common desire and would probably lay aside differences for that moment. This would prove that it could be done.
2006-07-01 22:02:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Heron By The Sea 7
·
7⤊
3⤋
The world would be so boring...and mind you, you're probably thinking exact same positive thought--everyone could also be simultaneously thinking of hurting others--which would amount to a massive violent outbreak. Honestly, having different thoughts gives humanity its checks and balances--though I know it isn't truly reflected by the current state of international affairs. But do look back on a smaller, more personal level and you'll see how different thoughts DO make days and lives better...
2006-07-01 21:56:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tomcat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We think, therefore we are...however, like-mindedness would only accomplish something if everyone who thought that very thought would actually do something about their convictions.
A question about your question...if everybody DID think the same thought at the same time, what would the odds be that they all had the same intent or desire regarding the thought?
One could think 'world peace' and be longing for it to come about, the other might think 'world peace' ,never believing their heart that it will ever happen.
2006-07-01 22:07:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by steves_wifey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe every person who is aware of mankind's present status on this planet...has at least thought of, wished for, prayed for or questioned if it's possible. It doesn't seem that individuals thinking about world peace by themselves or as part of a global prayer chain will have any effect on mankind's ultimate problem. The fact that we all can't get along.
2006-07-01 22:03:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mrs. Mojo Jojo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it would not replace it to a reality. innovations inclusive of attractiveness are strictly relegated to opinion because, even as each and absolutely everyone contained in the international would discover the picture to be eye-catching, it continues to be each and every persons decision even if to discover it eye-catching. that's the adaptation between reality and opinion, decision. that is about the alternative no longer the top.
2016-10-14 01:25:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by keys 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What if we could have peace with animals too, and not have to eat them, because I love animals, and the world!
2006-07-01 21:59:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, that is never going to happen. You can't even get everyone in one church to think the same thought.
2006-07-01 21:54:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm all for peace. But it would get kind of boring then, wouldn't it?
2006-07-01 22:06:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They'd all want to park in the same space at the same time -- and wouldn't THAT be inconvenient?
2006-07-01 21:54:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Sage on the Hudson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i do believe we would Achieve
2006-07-01 21:54:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by sweetistperson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋