English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

hell no, you should take it at her pace.

2006-07-01 15:48:54 · answer #1 · answered by pieninja 5 · 0 0

Yes. This would be a different answer if I were very young, but post-college, things are different.

Here's why: Women vary as far as their sexuality and their so on, but you need a cutoff point to determine where they are with that or you'll end up with one of the silly ones that tries to use sex as leverage.

If the woman really doesn't like you physically, then you need to break up after a month (actually sooner than that), and if she doesn't like you enough to have sex with you, then that's not really liking you enough, at least for me.

But especially with older women, if she still has the kind of hang-ups about sex that are common with younger ones, then she's not the kind I want to be with, and respect myself enough to not waste my time pining away for something I won't have. You should too.

2006-07-01 22:59:43 · answer #2 · answered by electroberry1 3 · 0 0

The fact that you're considering leaving a woman because she won't have sex with you soon enough, and the fact that she's waiting for the right time, makes me think she might be too self-respecting for you.

2006-07-01 22:50:28 · answer #3 · answered by fruitnroo 4 · 0 0

no! it takes time for relationship to reach the point where both people love each other enough to have sex. you would be a terrible boyfriend if you left your girlfriend just because she didnt want to sex with you after only knowing you for a month. You obviosly dont deserve to be wit h any woman if you only want sex with her.

2006-07-01 22:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by watermeloniegirl 2 · 0 0

I would leave because after three months, you are too attached to break up if you find out someone is a dead lay. I think that if you don't get it on within 8 weeks, cut it off.

2006-07-01 22:50:29 · answer #5 · answered by dawubbies 2 · 0 0

any woman worth having would not have sex in the first month

2006-07-01 22:51:41 · answer #6 · answered by night_fox51 4 · 0 0

if i were a guy I would say No!
My hubby choose not to have sex before we knew we were very serious - it took forever! but I waited around for him as well.

2006-07-01 22:49:24 · answer #7 · answered by bluskygreengrass 5 · 0 0

i make a man wait a year, im not some two-bit penny trick skank. if you don't want to wait, then you arent worth the time in bed anyway so BUBYE! MEN ARE SO SHALLOW WHEN THEY PRESSURE WOMEN TO DO THIS AFTER A FEW WEEKS, PLEASE. THEN YOU CALL THEM WHORES? GET OVER YOUR ***** AND GROW UP!

2006-07-01 22:52:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

if you're serious about this woman, and you believe this woman is for keeps, NO. but if you're after this woman just for the thrills of it, then it's totally up to you.

2006-07-01 22:50:40 · answer #9 · answered by toughthrone 2 · 0 0

if he leaves because you wouldn't have sex with him he ain't worth having

let him go find some two bit ho to screw.....you are better than that!

2006-07-01 22:49:27 · answer #10 · answered by Jennifer B 5 · 0 0

No, and its probably good that shes slow to open up. Shows that she ain't a whore.

2006-07-01 22:49:42 · answer #11 · answered by Wizdom Bomb 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers