2006-07-01 11:53:45 · 7 answers · asked by Paul B 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Genealogy
Both Bill AND Hillary are related to the Queen of England, just like Bush and Kerry and they ALL are descended from Charlemagne (Charles The Great).
This bloodline also includes the Habsburgs, the most powerful family in Europe under the Holy Roman Empire; Geoffrey Plantagenet and the Plantagenet royal dynasty in England; King John, who signed the Magna Carta; King Henry Ist, II, and III, who were extremely close to the Knights Templar, as was King John;
Mary Stuart and the Stuart Dynasty, including King James Ist of England, sponsor of the King James version of the Bible; King George Ist, II, and III; Edward Ist, II, and III, Queen Victoria; Edward VII; George V and VI; Queen Elizabeth II; Prince Charles and Elizabeth's other offspring, Anne, Andrew and Edward; Princes William and Harry from Charles' "marriage" to Princess Diana;
US Presidents, George Washington, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and George Bush are all named in the charts as strands of this bloodline; it was passed on to the year 2000 US presidential favorite, George W. Bush Jr., and his brother, Jeb Bush, the Governor of Florida.
In fact if you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from this line. Genealogical sources, like the New England Historical Genealogical Society and Burkes Peerage, have shown that 33 of the 42 presidents to Clinton are related to Charlemagne and 19 are related to England's Edward III, both of whom are of this bloodline.
2006-07-01 12:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Linda 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Queen Elizabeth Bloodline
2016-12-28 07:22:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
How far back does Queen Elizabeth II's royal bloodline go?
2015-08-19 12:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Queen Elizabeth's royal bloodline goes back to 1457 and Margaret Beaufort, a descendant of King Edward III.
2006-07-06 23:28:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no offense, but none of the people who have "answered" so far have any idea of what they are talking about.
just because someone is someway descendant from Charlemagne, does not make them a member of his bloodline!
genealogists have actually proven that just about everyone in Western Europe (or descended from someone from there) are descendants of Charlemagne. to be a real member of a royal bloodline, a person must have an unbroken and direct male descent from one.
Queen Elizabeth II's actual royal bloodline is the German house of Wettin, which can be traced back to Biblical royal genealogies through ancient Scandinavian royal houses.
the Hapsburgs of the Holy Roman Empire are NOT members of Charlemagne's bloodline either.
Charlemagne's bloodline does however live on in Elizabeth II's children as her husband Prince Philip is a member of Charlemagne's bloodline.
NONE of the American presidents are part of Charlemagne's bloodline, though General Robert E. Lee of the Confederacy is.
2006-07-07 21:35:58 · answer #5 · answered by Lorena Deranla 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lineage Of Queen Elizabeth
2016-11-10 09:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by riedinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On the British Monarchy web site, earliest date I seen was 1760 in the Royal Archives, but there was more info there. I just typed in her name on yahoo search and found her web site. On rootsweb, there is alot of info but a little confusing, but the earliest date I seen was in the 1300s. There I typed Queen as last name, Elizabeth as first. Scroll down to Worldconnect and check it out. One person had someone in the Royal Family with over 20 children, more than one set of parents, and that was the confusion.
2006-07-01 15:24:14 · answer #7 · answered by Dottie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The earliest known "substantiated" member of the bloodline would be Caswallon a chieftain /king who ruled a small area of England just north of the Thames. He would of ruled sometime between 60-48 B.C. He is known as one of the kings who defied Julius Caesar in his attempted conquest of England in 55 B.C.
2006-07-02 10:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by HistoryFanatic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋