Would Christians like to see Scientists stop doing research before they find too much information?

Question

If scientist keep searching, they're bound to find more information. Do you really want that? Do you really want the scientist to find some more information that would make more CHILDREN question Christianity?

Answer 1

If scientists keep searching, they will cause more children to become christians. You see, science is always proving the bible to be true.

Science is only discovering and observing what God created. For instance Isaiah 40:22 speaks of a Globular Earth. Scientists for many years said the earth was flat, but eventually, their "discovery" of a globular earth supported and proved what God had already declared, to be true.

Answer 2

I am a Christian and I also respect Science. You can be an educated person and still be Christian. The two are not mutually exclusive. Faith is believing with out proof and as a Christian I am proud to say I have faith.
On the other hand as an educator and parent I find Science fascinating . I pray the stem cell issue can get resolved in such a way that people will benefit from the medical advances it could offer. Perhaps if Christians would admit that Christianity is not a science and Science would be willing to acknowledge that there is validity to prayer and faith everyone could just respect the others beliefs and work together for a better world.

Answer 3

No. What I fear as a christian is that we wish to use our human power to learn more about a much much greater being. as humans we do not understand the magnitude of God's power yet our pride keeps us from admitting that for once we have met our match with one whom we can not comprehend. Scientists should keep seeking the truth for that is why God gave them the brains to venture into science. But unless they let go of human pride and seek answers straight for the source, they will forever hit a dead end and we will continue to wallow in ignorance and doubt and pass it on to our children who already know that there is a God. We just train them to think otherwise due to our own disbelief.

Answer 4

The more truth revealed by the Scientists, the more God our Creater is Glorified, the more truth revealed by the Scientists, much more is the wisdom of GOD THE CREATER is revealed, every wisdom that comes to the scientists from GOD THE CREATER is for the greater glory of GOD our great GOD. JESUS said I will great and might things
Jeremiah 33:3
'Call to me and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.'
Job 5:9
9 He performs wonders that cannot be fathomed, miracles that cannot be counted.

Answer 5

if the scientefic researches are true and correct..then it would support christianity and not contraindicate it..
but as every body know scientefic theories change every day..
for example there was a time when people thaught that earth is the center of the universe and any openion against that is sent to death..
for another time it was thought earh was a flat surface and any one who says it was a "ball" was sent to death..
so my friend if they discovered true things "that is not just theories" it will support christianity "which doesnt need any support by the way"..and if they were only faulty theories..time will prove that they were wrong as many others who came before them and many who will come after them..but christianity will stay as strong as a mountain that no theory can move it from its place

Answer 6

whilst your question might desire to easily be slightly sarcasm (uncertain), i visit take it heavily for a 2d: Why might desire to they supply up doing learn? All certainty is God's certainty. finally i might particularly no longer believe lies, whether the lies made me experience extra helpful in some procedures. 2 issues I do think of scientists might desire to be careful of: (a million) puzzling records as against their intepretation of the suggestion, and (2) assuming that any conclusions drawn are the appropriate answer. From what i will tell, we are able to anticipate and clarify many things -- adequate to harness the organic international to our very own whims -- yet on the middle we nonetheless don't understand what fact is or why. (Why do atomic debris even exist interior the 1st place? Why do they act how they do... and not some incorrect way? etc. all of us know a great deal, yet no longer each thing.) after all, the scientists and philosophers of the early Enlightenment and Age of reason sought for solutions *by way of fact* of God and not even with him -- they desperate that He grew to become into an orderly and rational God, so there may be an order interior the universe that they might detect in the event that they searched puzzling adequate. so a procedures as infants questioning Christianity... area of the problem is that the religion has become an psychological one, the place you're instructed to believe specific issues "purely by way of fact." the infants are actually not experiencing God influencing their mum and dad or the adults around them. they do no longer see any genuine adjustments in human beings -- adjustments that could perplex them in good procedures. they do no longer see the potential of religion. they oftentimes purely see the inconsistencies. in case you chop back a baby's interactions with God to go wisdom, any obvious conflicts interior the "records" will destroy their faith, and interior the tip, we on no account study all of the solutions besides. faith is meant to be handed on from a individual to a individual, by employing how they stay their lives and manage others.

Answer 7

I douibt that Christianity has any objections to science. In all that I have ever read on the subject, science has not disproven creation annnnd in many cases have only served to prove it. The diehard Darwinists will jump on this very quickly, but I've never seen any proof from science, only unproven theories.

Answer 8

Scientists who don't make the foolish mistake of precluding God from their interpretations of their findings are fine. It's just those ones who admit that they can't consider the supernatural that I could do without.

Dr. Brown is a highly respected member of the scientific community. "Walt Brown received a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where he was a National Science Foundation Fellow. He has taught college courses in physics, mathematics, and computer science. Brown is a retired full colonel (Air Force), West Point graduate, and former Army ranger and paratrooper. Assignments during his 21 years in the military included: Director of Benet Research, Development, and Engineering Laboratories in Albany, New York; tenured associate professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy; and Chief of Science and Technology Studies at the Air War College. For much of his life, Walt Brown was an evolutionist, but after many years of study, he became convinced of the scientific validity of creation and a global flood. Since retiring from the military in 1980, Dr. Brown has been the Director of the Center for Scientific Creation and has worked full time in research, writing, and speaking on origins."

___________

Embryos of different vertebrates look alike in their early stages, giving the superficial appearance of relationship. (crit) Embryos of different vertebrates DO NOT look alike in their early stages. "This idea was fathered by Ernest Haeckel, a German biologist who was so convinced that he had solved the riddle of life's unfolding that he doctored and faked his drawings of embryonic stages to prove his point." (William R. Fix, "The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution," 1984, p. 285.) Haeckel was exposed as a fraud in 1874 by Professor Wilhelm His. Nevertheless, Haeckel's fraudulent drawings (or similar representations) remain in high school and college biology textbooks to this day as evidence for evolution.

__________

Photographs of peppered moths naturally camouflaged while at rest upon tree trunks as evidence for natural selection. (crit) Biologists have known since the 1980's that peppered moths don't normally rest on tree trunks. The photographs found in the textbooks were staged using dead moths glued to tree trunks. (Jonathan Wells, Ph.D., "Second Thoughts about Peppered Moths," 1999: http://www.arn.org/docs/wells/jw_pepmoth.htm.)
___________

Answer 9

NOOOOOOOO!!! The other way around. Many scientists already converted to Christianity. Like Darwin & so forth!!! We like Scientists. They find proof!!!

Answer 10

If anything, more research into how things work in this world will confirm Christianity as true and vital for life in the world to come.