The muslims and christians here don't just say thinking this is blasphemy. I think what they are trying to say is thinking at all is blasphemy. You should be blind and dumb or you will be threatened for asking any reasonable questions.
Yes, the bible is a "Holey" book. Lots of holes in their theory. Even if one believes for a second she got pregnant being a virgin, surely one cannot pass a whole child being a virgin.
2006-07-01 01:27:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
6⤋
I couldn't stop laughing at Alwyn's response. I don't believe in the bible I think it's like any other book written by man. So umm would I believe in a such thing as the Virgin Mary no. Not before or after. The hymen.
2006-07-01 01:25:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do Christians have no trouble believing that Jesus "passed through the locked doors," yet have problem with the virgin birth?
The Church teaches that Mary was a virgin before conception, during conception and after giving birth.
H
2006-07-01 00:47:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since the whole thing was orchestrated by God Almighty to get His Son into the world, don't you think He's quite capable of seeing to it that Mary remained a lifelong virgin?
And to the answerer who said that the Hebrew word for virgin just means "unmarried woman". Think for a second. Any society which puts a premium on a female's untouched state, is NOT going to think of unwed as anything BUT virgin. Hmmmmph!
2006-07-01 00:55:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Granny Annie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the answer is rather elementary. the subject in basic terms exists via thought interior the trinity fantasy. The Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost as you call that's basically the ability via with God creates and performs events. So in accordance with those info Jesus remains the son of God.
2016-11-01 01:05:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mary (peace be upon her) give birth to "Jesus" natually as any woman. Mary was not impregnated by the "Holy Ghost" but by God's word "be" and "he was". God could have created "Jesus" without a parent, but God's wants to remind us that Jesus is not a god nor a sired son of God. But anonymous writers' and Paul's innovations made you and others think that way of Jesus and Mary and made you as well as others in doubt about them.
2006-07-01 01:00:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If even thinking abou tthat is indeed blasphemy, then I just wanted to thank you. I am trying to invent new blashemous thoughts each day and this really helped. To answer your question: I think he took it with him on his way out, then translated Hymen to Amen.
2006-07-01 00:50:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by McAtterie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No ,he was a caesarian birth.
But he broke his grandmother's heart when she found out her little Mary wasn't really a"good girl" anymore.
The holy ghost was just a name used on the birth certificate so they could claim maternity expenses back from social security.
2006-07-01 00:48:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by satnee2003 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was born in a manger -- how he got there is a fun story for sure -- but there is no discussion of a vagina in these Bible passages.
You really must pay more attention!
2006-07-01 00:46:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by fitpro11 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no he didn't it was a holy birth he didn't break her hymen n she is always a virgin
Believe it
2006-07-01 01:04:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by who k 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
U stupid phukwit!! Im sure you are a non-believerto come out with such blasphemy! *news flash* get a life moron!!
Good job i'm not muslim or i'd be terroizing you for that kind of statement!!
2006-07-01 00:55:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Boon5 3
·
0⤊
0⤋