2006-06-28 12:30:23 · 10 answers · asked by KnowhereMan 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
John 5:19 - "Then, Jesus answered and said to them, 'Most assuredly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He sees the Father do; for whatever He does, the Son also does in like manner.'"
2006-07-01 16:35:50 · update #1
I'm not sure I understand your question, but I would say that Christ was sent here to experience all of the same temptations that we humans experience, so in that aspect, no, He was like us, except that He did not allow these temptations to lead Him to sin.
As far as comparing Him to prophets, or philosophers, many great men have shared the same lines of thought, it doesn't necessarily make them plagiarists. "Great minds think alike", right?
Did I gather your question correctly?
PS>> As far as being the Son of God, He was, and IS, the ORIGINAL, one and only!
2006-06-28 12:39:54 · answer #1 · answered by shiba 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Question Have you read the bible and sorry you fill that way but He wasn't because if you get an Idea you right it down if you understand an Idea you do it if you are the Idea you give it freely there is more to it then what you have read and it only can be expressed not told or written it truly has to be lived He believed that he was the true son of the one all powerful God and Knelt to wash others feet at the last supper before he was to die
2006-06-28 19:41:42 · answer #2 · answered by Jason M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought that Jesus' most important contribution to philosophy was the Golden Rule. Then I discovered that Aristotle said it 500 years earlier.
I think he was a good man who had interesting ideas. I think he was too easy on his followers and too harsh on good men who were not followers.
In other words -- he was much like any leader.
2006-06-28 19:33:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you look at the view of the Jews towards God, they saw him as someone only the Priests could relate to. Jesus said we were all children of God and therefore had access to him. That was a very radical view at the time.
2006-06-28 20:30:24 · answer #4 · answered by swdMO 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was like the rest of the people of that era.
2006-06-28 19:34:22 · answer #5 · answered by lcayote 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not understand your question. Could you explain?
2006-06-28 19:34:29 · answer #6 · answered by dey_denn 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do u mean?? try rephrasing ur question.
2006-06-28 19:34:16 · answer #7 · answered by A Being 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is that supposed to mean?
2006-06-28 19:32:52 · answer #8 · answered by steves_wifey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't get the question
2006-06-28 19:33:59 · answer #9 · answered by elli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't get it.
2006-06-28 19:51:21 · answer #10 · answered by kwgng 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋