i figure it gets rid of all the dumbasses who dont wear protection or do drugs. it also gets rid alot of the poor minorities in the south.
2006-06-20 12:40:58 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ STDs
Yeah, too bad they didn't manufacture one that killed only Republicans...
2006-06-20 12:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Aids isnt always recieved by careless people who dont know their partners. As for the poor they havent done anything wrong to be ill stricken with it. I agree on the drug addict thing. But I dont agree with your iggnorant comment. Women, who were lets say raped but do not believe in abortion may birth a child. This child has done nothing to the world however the male who has raped the women may have transmitted aids not only to her but also the child now how is there any justice in that? You really should think a little deeper before making some bold statements. Now I am sure to some my example wont be well supported but think deeply, how many other ridiculous scenarios and events cause such quick and fatal spread of the disease. And to simply answer your question yes AIDS is THAT bad. Its diminishes your immunity to bacteria and diseases. Thus you are imminently prone to fatal exposure to common illness such as Flu, or Bronchitus, so and so forth.
2006-06-20 12:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by Sasha S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ur such an IGNORANT and STUPID A**HOLE!! Did you know that you can get AIDS by a blood transfusion????? I just hope ur prejudism doesn't slap u in the face by getting it, then you will be part of those " dumbasses who dont wear protection or do drugs", and oh..... part of a poor minority in the south! Dumbf*cks like you make me sick!
2006-06-21 11:26:40 · answer #3 · answered by CrazySexyCool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AIDS has killed dumbasses, druggies and poor minorities. AIDS has also killed smart people, talented artists, non-druggies, rich people and even children. It has left countless numbers of orphaned children in our world.
I guess it would depend on how a person looks at this devestation to decide if AIDS really is that bad.
2006-06-25 00:45:41 · answer #4 · answered by Gerald 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes Aids is bad., it can kill you. What about the innocent babies born with Aids? Did you also know that you can get Aids through a blood transfusion???????????? And for your information, there are people with Aids right here in the North, South, East, and West. I think maybe you need to read more about Aids before making ignorant comments!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-06-22 16:38:23 · answer #5 · answered by just m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure if you want to be a dick about it. There have been innocent children who have contracted from blood transfusions, There's a documented case where a woman contract HIV from her dentist accidently drooling in her mouth.
The virus has certainly escalating through promiscuity and is classified as a STD, it's a consequence of indescretion with you sleep with or sharing drug needles. But by means of population control? No sure I don't like it.
If it becomes much worse, there a going to be a lot more ways to contract the virus and you won't be so narrow minded about it.
2006-06-20 12:47:11 · answer #6 · answered by Levi I 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering it kills people--and there is no cure yet--it is the worst! Using protection does not always protect (AIDS can be caught by any bodily fluid--and by oral sex, as well as intercourse).
Instead of worrying about getting rid of poor southern minorities, why not focus on what can be done to help them?
2006-06-20 12:46:28 · answer #7 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you mean to ask, should we really be spending billions of dollars on a disease that is almost completely preventable. Well it is true, that if everyone acted accordingly, The AIDS virus could be completely wiped out in one generation, however that isn't going to happen. We still have irresponsible people on this planet, and that isn't going to change. Well, it is a bad disease, and plenty of people get it without knowing it, so I would say that the money is still justified.
2006-06-20 12:44:40 · answer #8 · answered by FORNIDO 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, those are some really interesting statements. I have to say I don't agree.
What about those that did not have a choice about it? Like blood transfusion paients before they really started research about aids? There are tons of people out there they did not get it because they did not think, but mearly a stroke of bad luck in a LIFE SAVING "Supposably" blood transfusion.
2006-06-20 12:44:05 · answer #9 · answered by ck_abella 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AIDS is all over the place. You couldn't even tell who had it. It is in white suburbia and all over the world. It is transmitted by oral sex even. There are a percentage of people who get it and don't know how, so there is a possible airborne or other method of transmission which scientists have yet to find.
2006-06-20 15:38:40 · answer #10 · answered by Steve B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't have poor minorities in the north, east or west???? Thank God for that. Now if we can work on helping those in the south.
2006-06-20 12:42:59 · answer #11 · answered by ladysodivine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋