Has controls on immigration always existed to entrench state control over the population?

Question

These controls come at the cost of economic growth and the welfare of the population. So the demand for free circulation of the world’s population is a powerful weapon in undermining the parasitic, oppressive state and moving to a universal democracy.

you people are some scared people. Bush really did a number on you huh? no wonder... willing sheep.
maaaAAA hhhhh..... LOL

Answer 1

The state will always be a reflection of the people. There will never be a universal, man made, working democracy. We'll all see to it with our sterling character and compassionate hearts.

Answer 2

I disagree. I think these controls come to protect the citizens who built the country to be the place everyone wants as a destination. Economics are considered in determining the proper rate of immigration, as are schools and other infrastructure. Where services are subsidized by the wealthier for the poorer, the poorer from all the world would like the most subsidized benefits. However, developed countries that subsidize services would lose the quality and sufficiency of those services if they took in more poor than the services were designed to accommodate.

Answer 3

Yes that is just what we need, free travel between the USA and Iran. I'm sure China or Cuba would just love your utopia. You do know why it's called utopia right?

Controls on immigration do not exist to entrench state control (using that term is saying all anyone need to know about you), but to protect it's citizens (which in the USA is the "state") from outside threats.

Answer 4

it is just the opposite of what you are thinking .I is to protect our economy and keep the bottom dwellers for wreaking havoc on our society...

Answer 5

That is so wrought with global disaster.