Who here has read the book "Holy Blood, Holy Grail", and what did you think of the material presented in that book?
2006-06-09 06:43:41 · 7 answers · asked by aurastin 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Interesting, though I would like to see it taken further (as to proofs, etc.). If you liked that book, try reading "The Woman with the Alabaster Jar." Sorry, I can't remember the name of the woman who wrote it.
2006-06-09 06:49:32 · answer #1 · answered by lothien 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Holy speculation Batman!
The book is plausible, but very weakly supported. Anything about Jesus is equally weak. The evidence he is purely mythical is stronger than the evidence that he was a historical person.
2006-06-09 06:48:26 · answer #2 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was an interesting book. It is historical and not fiction like the "Code" so some might find it dry.
2006-06-09 07:10:45 · answer #3 · answered by Professor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't read the book. So I'll answer this question with a relatively random answer, but does connect in some ways:
I fart in your general direction.
2006-06-09 06:46:12 · answer #4 · answered by calivane07 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have.
Dan Brown stole from there part of the info to "create" Davinci code.
I think it´s possible.
I mean, everything is possible! and I also think not everyone is ready yet to know some Truths.
2006-06-09 06:47:26 · answer #5 · answered by Kalvaina 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same "Fiction" as Dan Brown's book.
2006-06-09 06:45:24 · answer #6 · answered by williamzo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting theories, but just that...almost impossible to prove, although the author would claim otherwise!
2006-06-09 06:45:16 · answer #7 · answered by Rev Debi Brady 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋