English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The cells which make preparations to lodge in the walls of the uterus are genetically different from those of the mother. Why they are not rejected like an organ or a tissue transplanted to the mother's body has been for a long time an unsolved mystery.
The event of birth is a proof of a supreme creation, yet evolutionists try to make reference to it in defence of their theory. The fact that, in the creation of a new human being, every stage develops according to a very delicate design, is today an undisputed fact in the field of embryology. In this case, how do evolutionists try to interpret this fact of creation in reference to their theory?

See Haeckel’s Fabrications:
http://www.harunyahya.com/creation06.php

2006-06-09 04:36:10 · 6 answers · asked by Biomimetik 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

its a special design that God has made for the beings of this earth.

2006-06-09 04:41:05 · answer #1 · answered by 0110010100 5 · 0 0

I'm not really understanding how you are using this as an argument against evolution. You are right, babies are "created" in the mother's womb...and evolution continues. My creationist birthday would be nine months before my actual birthday, but that would have been in March, so I'm not even having a creationist birthday. We'll just have to celebrate the glimmer in my daddy's eye this month.

2006-06-09 05:05:30 · answer #2 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

How does that disprove evolution? That is simply an evolutionary device that helps a species propogate. Animals that carry their young, and give birth did not come about for a long time. They are called mammals. Crack a book sometime, Muhammed.

2006-06-09 04:44:04 · answer #3 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0 0

many christians do this, they are "religious right" from my understanding,

as an atheist i think life starts at conception, based on my understanding of the science of what life is,

but i am 29 and celebrated my birth in may

2006-06-09 04:39:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you need to go take a refresher course in basic biology again-then again if you are happy with what you think you know carry on just wouldnt use that arguement with anyone who understands biology-keep the peace old hippie

2006-06-09 04:46:07 · answer #5 · answered by bergice 6 · 0 0

No, because my head hurts, my feet stink, and I don't love Jesus.

2006-06-09 05:06:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers