when guillaume apollinaire (who invented the term) spoke of 'surrealism' he pointed out that if you want to build a machine to travel with you don't invent a 'walking machine' - you invent the wheel.
the surrealists decided that they did not have to paint strictly representational images to be able to show human consciousness at work. they realised the mind perceives the world, but the mind is not the world. they began to paint the things they saw in dreams, in fevers, and in optical illusions.
(the surrealists were fascinated by certain types of kaleidoscope).
dreams, hallucinations and optical illusions are all perfectly 'real' of course - but they are not 'real' in the limited sense that empirically minded nineteenth century painters had understood the term.
dali, magritte and paul delvaux all painted ordinary things - but ordinary things put together in unusual or surprising ways.
the surrealists were actually realist painters at base. but they painted a subjective (often psychoanalytic) reality rather than the objective reality we normally associate with realist painters.
2006-06-09 00:55:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by synopsis 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
It is not distancing at all. It looks like distance but in fact it is bringing you closer to reality as you view it with new eyes.. the artists eyes.
You do it by shifting.
You take stuff you can identify and move it into a new position. Dali streched elephants and let watches flow. Margrite made a painting where it is day and night at the same time. Just that I am able to discribe them in a few words is proof of that it is only a shift if reality. (opposite to f.i. a painting of a fictional creature that needs pages to describe)
If you were to think up new stuff you could bend your brain to thinking it is a new thing. That would not be surrealisme. Just the situation should be new not the actual objects in the art.
2006-06-09 01:13:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Puppy Zwolle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
useful, if a individual is extra hypersensitive to thoughts than others, i think of that it could certainly be a effective poison. all of us have regrets approximately some issues, yet once you look at it from the attitude that, demanding as that is to settle for, there are bells that basically won't be able to be unrung. And one would desire to pass on. To obsess over regrets can become overwhelming and melancholy gadgets in.
2016-10-30 10:50:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it has no proportion related to the space
it is stretched distorted with no realistic colors
it could be identical to real forms but it differes in the weird setting or wrong setting
2006-06-09 14:33:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by cactus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋