Then why don't they ask "If pigs descended from fish, why are there still fish?"?
I've never heard them ask that, and so I can only infer they have not heard of evolution in the paleozoic era.
(Of course we descended from fish too, but that's not the issue.)
Question: Does anybody know what church folks know or think about science?
.
2007-12-31 08:23:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If it casts doubt on their belief system, then they either reject it outright like the creationists do or they 'manage' scientific knowledge in a curious process so that their beliefs still make sense.
2007-12-31 08:28:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
there was never any evolution.i dont care how much science backs it up. im horrified of going to hell,so im going to ignore scientific truth.
relgion>science
blind faith>science
2007-12-31 20:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another example of someone opening their mouth and telling exactly what they do'nt know.
2007-12-31 18:42:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't answer for EVERY body, but I CAN say that after a "skeletal" study of the internal working of the cell, such as the mitochondria and the "energy cycle", protein and protein synthesis, cell duplication, and the double-stranded DNA coiled up in a helix, I have to agree with Dr. Flue.
Even though he received a lot of criticism, while working on a detailed study of the inner functioning of the DNA, he said in an article that it would be "intellectual suicide" to continue believing in evolution. The facts only point to one possible conclusion, and even though he didn't become a Christian, he IS convinced that it took intelligent design for life to have formed.
I have a question for YOU, now. Will you continue to commit intellectual suicide by believing the obvious lies of evolution?
Why not do a study on your own?
Here are a few tips for you:
The energy cycle the mitochondria goes through in converting raw materials into usable energy for the cell first loses 1 or 2 units of energy, which violates the very rules of evolution, and the laws of entropy!
The DNA is like a data information storage and retrieval system that makes the Cray Supercomputer look like child's play in comparison. Why not do a study on the size, the memory allocation, and the structure of both of these, and then you come back and tell me which one came from a series of accidents. Seeing as how the Cray is the simpler of the two, whatever you say about the origin of the DNA, I'm SURE you can say the same of the Cray!
And of course, don't forget to study information systems, because any expert will tell you that viable information can NEVER result from random chance! And yet, the DNA comes "pre-programmed" with all the necessary code to design a life! I mean, even the simplest single-celled protozoa has a DNA pair twisted into a double-helix which is just as complex as the most complex creature's DNA!
And don't forget to study how entropy and the 3 PROVEN laws of thermodynamics work, because these state that energy moves from ORDER to CHAOS, not from CHAOS to ORDER, which evolution spouts!
Sorry, but you're like a 5 year old who is just barely learning how to add 1+1, and trying to tell a math major who made all A's, even in calculus, that algebra ("Huh? what's that???") and geometry doesn't work!
STUDY, man! (Don't they teach ANY thing in school these days???)
2007-12-31 16:36:15 · answer #4 · answered by no1home2day 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
science has no place in religion. oil and water they are.
2007-12-31 16:34:52 · answer #5 · answered by eldredjonas191 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Has it ever occurred to you that the fish today were plankton 310 million years ago? Of course not. With people like you it's "either" "or": no in between. I wish you had either meat or vegetables to eat, not both. Choose your sides; good or evil.
2007-12-31 16:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
A fish turns into a human being
A fish turns into a human being
A fish turns into a human being
A fish turns into a human being
Are you serious? Do you not feel that this is highly (place atheist buzzword here) illogical? By the way, Science was one of my best subjects and I enjoyed studying God's creation, it's amazing!
2007-12-31 16:31:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
First, I am not a "munchkin"...I am a Christian. I believe in evolution. Did you know that some "church folks" are highly respected members of the scientific community? I have never found a scientist that minded what religion a colleague was if their work was good. You are very wrong to think that people of ALL religious beliefs are not actively involved in science!
2007-12-31 16:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by PROBLEM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know a lot more than you think I know and a lot less than I should.
2007-12-31 16:29:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If its not in the bible, it doesn't come up.
2007-12-31 16:28:21 · answer #10 · answered by punch 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋