If you have any clips of any pumas or any information about them, that will be great.
Thanks
2007-12-31 08:20:52 · 11 answers · asked by Mark S 3 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Ford
You lot dont know what you are taking about, the puma will rip any of your cars of the road any day you just try me.
2007-12-31 08:27:32 · update #1
I am a girl, using boyfriends email.
Just fed up with the comments i had.
2007-12-31 08:52:04 · update #2
frankie g- you wanna get your facts right, i know alot about cars im a mechanic.
So i thinks its you that dont know much about cars, i just like 2 ask these questions cos u get some really big headed horrible ppl on here.
2007-12-31 09:17:13 · update #3
Wouldnt of thought they are very fast. try typing it in on youtube tere will be clips of them on there
2007-12-31 08:24:26 · answer #1 · answered by pj890 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Puma is not a good starter car. At 17 the major consideration is the insurance. A 1.4 engine will push the insurance right up. Look at something 1.0. Yes it'sslow and boring but get some NCD before you consider anything else.
2016-04-02 04:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Keyo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when is 0-60 in 8.8 seconds and a top speed of 128 MPH considered fast? Beats walking I guess. I suppose it's pretty quick by euro ecomony car standards, but it's pretty slow overall.
2008-01-02 04:17:03 · answer #3 · answered by fodaddy19 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I owned two 1.7's and found they were nippy and fun to drive, rather than being fast. My only criticism of them was the inadequate braking and certainly I believe they required discs all round.
2007-12-31 09:36:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, but it wasnt meant to be.
The Puma was the little sister the to the Ford Cougar and followed the same principles.
Both emphasized handling over power. It can be modified into a fast car, but when stock it is all about fun driving it and maneuverability rather than straight line acceleration.
2007-12-31 09:24:18 · answer #5 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK so your a girl and know f**k all about cars and think a ford puma is an orgasm.
NOT.
2007-12-31 09:08:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Was going to answer this seriously...then I saw your edit.
128 mph, 0-60 in 8.8 seconds, according to Ford, so all you'd see of my Alfa would be its tail lights disappearing into the distance!
What are you doing driving a girl's car anyway?
2007-12-31 08:50:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Better go for the Cougar.
2007-12-31 08:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not really, but then I guess it depends what you're comparing it to.
I've had the misfortune to drive a Puma and my Volvo 1.9D is faster ...
2007-12-31 08:28:21 · answer #9 · answered by finch 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-12-31 08:26:24 · answer #10 · answered by Robert S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if it had a bigger engine then yes!
2007-12-31 08:24:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋