“Gospel of the Kingdom of God”
MARK 1:14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the Gospel of The Kingdom of God
From the above Verse, it is clear that Christ, Jesus-The Son of Mary preached the Gospel of The Kingdom of God. This Gospel (The Good News) actually contained the Words of God because of course, it was the Gospel of The Kingdom of God which was preached ONLY by Jesus. There is not even anything as the Gospel of Jesus as noted by Mark 1:1. The words of the Gospel which Jesus (pbuh) preached, were not his words as he says:
JOHN 14:24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
Matthew and John were actually the disciples of Jesus (pbuh). But did they really write these Gospels by themselves. Do we have Gospels “BY” Matthew and John? From an account in the Gospel of Matthew, we can clearly see that this Gospel is not written by Matthew himself:
MATTHEW 9:9 And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.
If Matthew would have been the author of this Gospel, he surely would have written that “.. and he saith unto “ME”… and “I” arose and followed him.”
Luke and Mark were not even the disciples of Jesus. Luke was a physician and a companion of St Paul and Mark was an interpreter who probably worked with St Peter in Rome.
The Gospels also differ from each other a lot:
Was Joseph the Son of Jacob (MATTHEW 1:16) or was he the Son of Heli (LUKE 3:23)?
Why isn’t the ascension of Jesus (pbuh) to heaven mentioned in Matthew and John?
These Gospels which were written down 100 Years after Jesus (pbuh) ascension, circulated anonymously, no names were attached to them until almost 200 and the Christian theologians who came up with the idea of having a New Testament was condemned as heretic.
Do we have that True Gospel which Jesus Christ (pbuh) Preached in Hebrew or Aramaic?
Did Jesus (pbuh) asked Matthew, Mark, Luke and John to write these Gospels?
How can Christians rely on the accounts in these Gospels which are the basic Pillars of their Faith?
Did Jesus or his Apostles follow a religion called Christianity? Who were the first 'Christians' ? Who founded Christianity and do the teachings of Christianity conform to the teachings of Jesus?
The mission of Jesus.
In 721 B.C.E the Jewish kingdom of Israel faced defeat at the hands of the Assyrians. Scattered abroad with their Temple destroyed, the Jews turned their focus onto the Law. Monotheism was once again lost, but this time in an ever increasing maze of elaborate rites and rituals.
It was this situation that was present in the world when Jesus received his calling from God. Upon beginning his ministry at the approximate age of 30, Jesus made it clear that his mission from God was to get the Jews back on track:
"For the son of man is come to save that which was lost." (Matthew 18:11)
"For I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:24)
Jesus also made it clear just what God wanted him to do :
"For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, He gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak" (John 12:49)
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17)
A careful study of Jesus' words will show that, contrary to what Christians may think, Jesus had no intention of starting a new religion; he only came to reiterate the message that God had given to all prophets before him: man was to obey God's Laws and worship Him alone.
At no time during his ministry did Jesus claim to be anything more than a human being, inspired by God. Indeed, he referred to himself as the son of man, and made it clear, in a number of verses throughout the Gospel, that he was merely a Messenger of God
Was Jesus' Mission a success?
"Why callest thou me good? There is none good but One, that is God." (Mark 10:18)
"...whosoever receives me, receives not me, but Him who sent me." (Mark 9:37)
"And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou has sent." (John 17:3)
"Now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard from God." (John 8:40)
"I ascend unto my Father and your Father, my God and your God." (John 20:17)
Despite all his efforts--wonderful words backed up with some pretty nifty miracles--Jesus was soundly rejected, especially by his own people.
Three years after he began his ministry, he was arrested and charged with sedition and blasphemy. Success had eluded him, at the end of his life on earth; he left behind only a mere handful of followers, not more than 500 at most.
The True Founder of Christianity
Approximately five years after Jesus' ascension into heaven, A twenty-five-year old zealot was on his way to Damascus to pick up a group of Nazarenes (The followers of Jesus called themselves as Nazarenes) for return to Jerusalem when he had a vision in which he claimed Jesus appeared, asking why Saul was persecuting him. Saul changed his name to Paul and went off into the deserts of Arabia in order to think about just how he was going to go about carrying out what he believed to be a command from Jesus to go out and preach.
Exactly WHAT to do was quite a dilemma for him, however; since the Jews had rejected Jesus and his message, Paul didn't think he stood much of chance of getting through to them, either. He made up his mind that it would be best to simply dismiss them off and target the Gentiles (non-Jews) instead.
The Romans and the Greeks, who made up the Gentile population of Paul's world, were pagans who worshiped a plethora of gods and goddesses. Temples and statues of their deities abounded in the land, and Roman law had it that all people, with the exception of the Jews, must pay homage to the gods.
Paul knew that people with such deep-reaching pagan beliefs were not going to accept the idea that grace and salvation could come from a person who was only considered to be a most upright and righteous human being. If Paul wanted quick results in his ministry, he knew that he would have to "modulate" things a bit, taking into account the culture of the Gentiles.
Paul Maier, in his book "First Christians", tells us that thirteen years elapsed between the time Paul "received his calling" and the time that he began preaching. During that thirteen years, Paul's creative mind put in a lot of overtime; when he finally returned to Damascus, he came back armed with the knowledge that the Gentiles would demand a tangible god within their new religion, and he was prepared to give this to them.
Paul was wildly successful in his subsequent missionary efforts, what with the accommodations he ended up making for the Gentiles. Although the religion of Christianity takes its name from Jesus Christ, Paul of Tarsus must be considered as its true founder, as he is the one who conceived all of its doctrines, and set up its churches throughout the world of his time. Christians don't deny this, either: "No figure in Christian history stands so tall or has had such a tremendous influence as has Saul of Tarsus..."
In his book "The 100: A Ranking of the most Influential Persons In History", author Michael Hart concurs in saying:
"No other man played so large a role in the propagation of Christianity."
There is one big problem with this picture, however: The teachings of Paul, the true founder of Christianity, cannot be found anywhere in the teachings of Jesus or in those of prophets before him.
The following are some of the innovations that Paul introduced into "his" religion of Christianity.
1. The divinity of Jesus
2. The trinity
3. Atonement
4. Salvation by faith
Using these doctrines Paul achieved phenomenal success in his ministry. The Jews may have brushed Jesus aside, but the Gentiles flocked to Paul's side, as he gave them just what they wanted in their new religion. The term for the earlier followers of Jesus –Nazarenes was dropped in favor of a new, more 'appropriate' name: Christians, or followers of Jesus Christ.
This new religion of Christianity "...was abundantly interwoven with mythological content drawn heavily from pagan sources..." along with having a theology "...which was produced as the need arose to suit the mentality of the times..."
Later Church leaders thought to neatly end the confusion by saying that Jesus was God-incarnate--an eternal being who "chose" to become a man in the womb of Mary. Jesus had, in other words, two natures--divine and human-- which were united in one single person. While they probably meant well, making a statement such as this only led to more confusion.
The Jews did brush Jesus aside; in a way, however, the religion of Christianity as conceived by Paul has also brushed Jesus aside. Despite what a Christian might say, one will find no evidence wherein Jesus himself puts forth any of the afore--mentioned doctrines within the Gospels. Since Jesus had no plans to start a new religion, it goes without saying that he also did not formulate any doctrines for such.
All Christian doctrines are the work of Paul, based on his desire to gain favor--and new converts--among the non Jews of his time. By incorporating pagan beliefs into the teachings of Jesus, Paul achieved phenomenal success in his ministry, but at the price of tearing down everything that true monotheism stands for. In so doing, Paul abrogated all teachings of Jesus and gave mankind a set of beliefs that have plagued his sense of reason ever since. It is here --the true nature and role of Jesus, as opposed to the Christian view of such -- where we find the fundamental difference between Islam and Christianity.
2007-12-30 21:50:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋
Who is (the) inventor of (the) word "rapture" or "Paradise Earth" (?) Because I could not find it in any version of (the) Bible.
2007-12-31 13:18:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jereme K 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You might peruse this..
http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect2chpt1art1p2.htm
A Catholic
http://www.vatican.va
2007-12-31 12:22:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some guy in ancient Babylon and added to in ancient Egypt. The true author was Satan, though he does not claim his work skulking in the background.
It has proved to be a good way to deceive people away from true beliefs found in the Bible. So stuck in the past, they refuse to consider they are wrong.
2007-12-31 09:33:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by grnlow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first recorded use of the word "Trinity" in Christian theology was in about AD 180 by Theophilus of Antioch who used it, however, to refer to a "triad" of three days: the first three days of Creation, which he then compared to "God, his Word, and his Wisdom."
Neither the word "trinity" nor the concept is Biblical. The "Christian" trinity was invented by the Catholic Church in the 4th century. As A Catholic Dictionary notes: “The third Person was asserted at a Council of Alexandria in 362 . . . and finally by the Council of Constantinople of 381.”
2007-12-31 06:54:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by LineDancer 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Christianity claims that the one, true, "eloha" (or,"god", as they call it), whose name is "God", consists of three persons. So, somewhere along the line, an English-speaking Christian proposed the word trinity to describe the split personality of this "eloha". Ironically, however, their are three characters in the original TaNaKH (Hebrew "Old Testament") named "God" (spelled "gimmel- dahlet", in the Hebrew language). The first mentioned is the seventh-born son of Y-isra'El (Israel, or Jacob), and appears in Genesis 30:11. The second is a prophet of Yahoveh (YAH-ho-VEH) who served as King David's "seer", and is recorded in 2 Samuel 24:11-19. And the third was a "false" eloha mentioned by the prophet Yesha'Yah (Isaiah) in Isaiah 65:11. And so, there actually are three "Gods", or "Gahd's", in the original scriptures.
2007-12-31 06:31:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by eliyah52 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly.
Jesus never mentioned it either.
The idea was imported in early christianity from pagan religions that showed their gods with three faces, implying that they could see everything. There are many examples of these three faced gods in museums worldwide.
2007-12-31 06:19:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by pugjw9896 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Thats simple it was the devil himself to trick you again!
Ya and that stupid King that didn't care about you or me or anyone else! AstugfarAllah!
2007-12-31 06:16:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The concept of the "holy trinity" was invented by the men at the Council of Nicea in the early 300s. There is no biblical basis for it, it was decided by committee. Then, in true christian fashion, they murdered the non-believers of the new concept or tortured them until they claimed to believe.
Yay christians!!
2007-12-31 06:14:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually it is not a Trinity. It is a Trinitarin Unity. The Father, Son, the Holy Ghost. Om, Tat & Sat.
The Trinitarian Unity is a pagan concept. The Sun is the source of all energy and the ancients worshipped this symbol the Supreme. The Solar myth spread into all religions. In Christianity, it became the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost and in Hinduism, Om, Tat & Sat.
The Sun, the symbol of the Supreme Consciousness, was symbolically the Creator at dawn, the Destroyer at midday and the Preserver at Dusk.
This is a controversial statement I am making. Hope you will agree that Religion & Philsophy are one, for all nations !
2007-12-31 05:59:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by astrology360 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Christianity has digressed from the concept of the Oneness of God, however, into a vague and mysterious doctrine that was formulated during the fourth century. This doctrine, which continues to be a source of controversy both within and without the Christian religion, is known as the Doctrine of the Trinity. Simply put, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity states that God is the union of three divine persons - the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit - in one divine being.
If that concept, put in basic terms, sounds confusing, the flowery language in the actual text of the doctrine lends even more mystery to the matter:
"...we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity... for there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Ghost is all one... they are not three gods, but one God... the whole three persons are co-eternal and co-equal... he therefore that will be save must thus think of the Trinity..." (excerpts from the Athanasian Creed)
Let's put this together in a different form: one person, God the Father + one person, God the Son + one person, God the Holy Ghost = one person, God the What? Is this English or is this gibberish?
It is said that Athanasius, the bishop who formulated this doctrine, confessed that the more he wrote on the matter, the less capable he was of clearly expressing his thoughts regarding it.
The word ' trinity' can not be found in bible but it is mentioned in the hOly Quran:
They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three in a Trinity, for there is no god except One God." (Qur'an 5:73) It is worth noting that the Arabic language Bible uses the name "Allah" as the name of God.
2007-12-31 05:56:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by zahida shireen 4
·
0⤊
2⤋