Isn't it unfair that the people in the Bible who actually witnessed miracles didn't have to have faith?

Question

At least not the same kind of faith Christians talk about today.

Answer 1

good point. Modern Christianity is basically nothing but faith, but of course people seeing the world flood, races scattered, seas parted and such shouldn't have had much trouble keeping it in their pants and sacrificing whatever animal was demanded.

And while we're on the subject, isn't it a little unfair that Jesus knew he was the son of God when he was crucified? I'd be willing to die too if i had superpowers and a chair warmed for me at the side of God.

Answer 2

God required faith of many. bear in mind Noah? He began construction the ark in the previous the rain began. the little ones of Israel had to definitely walk into the river Jordan in the previous the waters parted. The ravenous widow became asked to furnish all of her ultimate sustenance in the previous the prophet blessed her with adequate oil to get her in the direction of the famine. They have been all required to instruct faith in the previous the miracle, and those are in easy terms a handful of examples. maximum often, in fact, people in the Bible in easy terms witnesses miracles whilst that they had shown themselves. nevertheless, no longer anybody demands a miracle in the 1st place. some can know that the solar will upward thrust each and each morning even in the previous they understand the technology at the back of it. we don't all see angels or witness people walking on water, yet we don't all choose it, the two. Nor has God ceased to accomplish miracles. They ensue continuously, whether we don't continually know them on the time. Miracles super and small, God maintains to look after us. Do you incredibly think of the miracles defy the regulations of nature? Or is God merely working applying organic regulations we don't totally understand? after all, there is plenty we nevertheless do no longer understand. that's silly to think of that miracles will no longer be able to ensue merely because of the fact we gained't understand how they befell. A miracle isn't defined as something that defines the regulations of nature. they are merely issues we gained't clarify thoroughly. God is an analogous for all and sundry, Christian or no longer, atheist or no longer. nevertheless, whether you do no longer opt to have faith, does it injury you if we do? all of us have the main ideas-blowing to our own ideals, can we no longer?

Answer 3

Nobody has ever actually witnessed a miracle. The laws of the universe prevail throughout all space and time; there are no exceptions.

Answer 4

According to the Gospels, the apostle Peter witnessed many miracles, yet he denied Jesus not once, but three times, under pressure.

Answer 5

And you actually believed those who actually "witnessed miracles" wrote the bible?

Answer 6

They absolutely had to have faith.

They saw the miracles, but the bible tells us that many, many people did "miracles" in those days.

They had faith that the miracles were of God, and that the truth was spoken by the Lord Jesus Christ.

Answer 7

They didn't all have faith...people didn't follow Jesus because of miracles...those that followed Him did so because He gave them faith and filled them because they truly believed in Him and saw Him (not only with their physical eyes).

Answer 8

Of course. It's easy to believe in Christ if you were an apostle and actually walked around with the guy as he was raising dead people and such. Even then, they freaked out when he was captured and killed.

Answer 9

My guess is that the people back then didn't witness any of the miracles either. Back then, as it is today, the miracle stories were pure legend and set far enough into the past so that nobody could check their veracity.

Answer 10

priests can make miracles in the old testament... i wonder where god said that he is going to stop the use of magic for humans.