Note: this question was originally asked in the local DC area section, since the natives and wanna be natives lack the morals and smarts to answer, I now pose it to the US yahoo community
1. If volunteering is required in order to make a living/graduate from HS or college aren't we devaluing volunteerism. IOW people will do it to get ahead and not out of altruism.
2.What does this say about organizations that are willing to enforce a policy of indentured servitude instead of employing a qualified person? Are they that desperate to save money?
3.What about those who want to volunteer but are ignored becase the organization has a quota to fufill with said HS, University or other organization.
4. Aren't we slowly killing the American dream since those the only ones who can afford to volunteer or intern for more than one calander year are those whose families can afford to support them for said length of time. IOW we are maintaining the status quo
2007-12-30
10:59:18
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Community Service
So far I like craven's answer. But to clarify I said did mention the DC area.
IOW the mindset of the non native is "If it doesn't make dollars it doesn't make sense." The COL here is extremely high.
This isn't to say that ppl don't volunteer but here volunteerism/interning (for a year or better) is a requirement for many NPO/or political jobs. I know someone who could only afford to volunteer for 6 mos. When asked about her volunteer experience by an interviewer she physically pointed out her length of time to the interviewer and was told, "That's not volunteer experience" (!)
As far as being turned down only an organization in total disarray would turn down someone willing to work for free. Most volunteers in this area push paper, canvass, do simple data entry and telemarket. Not something you have to have the highest qualifications for.
Finally, volunteerism does cost time one could use to pursue paid or better employment, time with family/ friends
2007-12-31
11:05:19 ·
update #1