It seems like conservative political views and Biblical literalism go hand-in-hand. I was wondering if this is actually the case or if I'm mistaken.
2007-12-30 10:16:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Jimmy Carter.
2007-12-30 10:21:10 · answer #1 · answered by S K 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
i could circulate with A, B and E jointly as no longer ruling out C outright. jointly as many Biblical literalists are undereducated approximately psychological ailment, that's under no circumstances authentic of all. that's desirable to wish for all of us who's ill, in spite of if the ailment impacts the concepts, the spirit, the physique or all the above. We could desire to additionally believe that Christ is sufficient for all of our desires. Demon possession is a real phenomenon, yet psychological ailment does no longer unavoidably recommend demon possession or demonic interference. psychological ailment is generally speaking the consequence of chemical imbalances interior the concepts. in specific circumstances those imbalances are genetic, different situations they are the consequence of tangible or psychological trauma, and in specific circumstances the reasons are inexplicable. Demons could desire to not greater be the predicted clarification for psychological ailment than they are the predicted clarification for diabetes, that's additionally the consequence of chemical imbalance stemming from the pancreas. although, as Christians we do look after that circumstances of demon possession do exist. If different reasons / remedies of psychological imbalance have been exhausted, and signs and warning signs of demon possessions do exist, that's no longer incorrect to aim exorcism. Exorcism could desire to by no potential be bodily or spiritually abusive and could be observed by utilising persevering with religious and psychological counseling centers.
2016-10-20 11:03:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are mistaken. I know several, although I will never figure out why anyone would believe in the Bible and support the slave mongering, anti-civil-rights party.
2007-12-30 10:24:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm a moderate--I support gay rights......the whole shebang.Yet, I am what you might call a "fundie"
I guess the difference is I SINCERELY believe in displaying grace to ALL.
2007-12-30 10:23:28 · answer #4 · answered by Sunny And '74 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm a conservative and I am not religious at all.
2007-12-30 10:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by harshmistressmoon 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are many bible believers who are independent or simply apolitical.
god bless
2007-12-30 10:30:13 · answer #6 · answered by happy pilgrim 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're looking at one.
2007-12-30 10:25:51 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. E 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see how you can use "republican" and "conservative" in the same paragraph.
2007-12-30 10:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
There might have been in the past.
2007-12-30 10:20:31 · answer #9 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
hmmm. i have never met one.
2007-12-30 10:20:01 · answer #10 · answered by amanda c 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋