and if jesus was killed for claiming to be king of the jews, then wouldn't it make sense that his followers would try to hide his heirs?
2007-12-30 07:25:23 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I wouldn't know since I wasn't around at the time period, and I wasn't in contact with Jesus. It would possibly make sense that his followers would hide the heirs in protection but I question the idea of that as well. How can you be sure that he had heirs and if he did have children how could you be sure that they would want to be known and come out into society on their own accord. There are to many questions that can't be answered due to lack of evidence and the destruction of information to give you a concrete answer to this question. Right now it is all hypothetical and there is nothing really wrong with that.
2007-12-30 07:40:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even though the pictures are always showing Him as a blonde, blue-eyed, good-looking fellow. The Bible says that He was not an attractive man. He also had a mission of being an example for us. The Bible says that if we are called to God's service as a single person, we should remain that way. If married, we should remain so. He was single before He came so marrying would not have made sense. He was one of a kind with a prepared body just to come here and give His life for us. Without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sins. He knew what He came for and did just that.
If He had married and had heirs, it would have been before His ministry took off--so why would they hide his family? They didn't know who He was.
2007-12-30 07:59:41 · answer #2 · answered by amjwings 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was supposed to have lived a normal life. He was a Jewish man, so a normal Jewish man WOULD have gotten married, fathered children, etc. Of course it would have been a "normal" thing to have hidden his heirs, since Jesus was killed for claiming the title of King of the Jews.
2007-12-30 07:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can you say,"The Da Vinci Code"?I knew you could!
It's foolish to think that Jesus never married as it was custom if not duty,to be married and have children according to Hebrew law. And Jesus never claimed to be king of the jews either,that's Christian propaganda (No,I'm not bashing Christians,but they do have a lot to answer for) whether or not their is or ever was a royal bloodline traceing back to Jesus and The Magdelane is pure conjecture, but Man! Does it sell books!
TL
2007-12-30 07:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by TL 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus exchange into no longer "lacking" ~ you in basic terms won't be in a position to learn, are you able to? He and His kinfolk have been ordinary of their community. Mark 6:3 "isn't this the chippie, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters right here with us? and that they have got been offended at him." that kind of mucky hypothesis can in basic terms come from an intruder who desperately needs to "justify" working far off from God. The Lord proved Himself already, and multitudes have experienced the liberty of the redemption He presented and have witnessed the skill of His Spirit interior the lives of His human beings. God isn't required to be checked off on your grimy score card. you're regrettably wrong. Why do no longer you come across a activity?
2016-10-09 21:45:41 · answer #5 · answered by banegas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, just like you say how do we know he isn't married, how do we know he was? Without any type of significant evidence (blood samples, writings, historical documents) we cannot conclude if he was or was not married. In the end, we can just leave that up to speculation. Even historians debate on this matter and cannot agree with each other.
2007-12-30 07:30:54 · answer #6 · answered by SOOH 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The fact that he surrounded himself with swarthy fishermen after reaching sexual maturity, strongly questions whether Jesus would have ever wanted to get Married, do it is very unlikely.
Same sex marriage was not an option in Judea 2000 years ago
2007-12-30 07:29:27 · answer #7 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jesus was most likely married as was the custom of that time.
Why did the church seek to conceal so much?
2007-12-30 07:34:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The worse thing about history is that people try to make up their own accounts of what happened. And thats when you have two sides to the story...
2007-12-30 07:30:30 · answer #9 · answered by SMX™ -- Lover Of Hero @};- 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he had been married, he would have treated his wife the way he told others to treat theirs...she would have been his helpmeet, his partner in his work...and there is no evidence to suggest any woman played that kind of role in his life.
2007-12-30 07:30:06 · answer #10 · answered by KAL 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋