No cannibalism means eating someone of you're own species
2007-12-30 05:42:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no,cannibalism is the eating of your own species.Fascinating how the 40% DNA figure fits right in with TOE that says we are MUCH MORE distantly related to trees than we are say,to chimpanzees,who we share 96 % or so of DNA.Anyway you look at it,TOE is VERY consistent.Beautiful,very verified theory.Thanks for pointing that out.Good job!
2007-12-30 13:39:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bananas and humans don't share any DNA. We aren't even in the same kingdom.
2007-12-30 13:39:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alex H 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How cute.
Here's something for you. Bananas is a high source of potassium. Potassium is needed in our bodies, that "potassium/chloride pump" thing. Anyway when pt have to take it through the IV it burns and itches like hell. So is that burning the work of !!!! SATAN !!!!?
2007-12-30 13:49:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ms Bubbles I think he might be a banana
on the other hand thats probably unfair to bananas
2007-12-30 13:37:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It depends are you a banana? If so the I suggest you go find a monkey and die.
2007-12-30 13:40:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jimmy V 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No on the DNA, Yes, because you're a fruit.
2007-12-30 13:43:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by punch 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It has nothing to do with DNA and everything to do with SPECIES. Are you a banana?
2007-12-30 13:35:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Obviously you misunderstand how exactly the 40% figure comes about~
We share 40% of the DNA protein sequences, not 40% exact DNA copies. You cannot dig out a portion of banana DNA and a portion of human DNA, compare them and find a match beyond a few groups, we don't even have the same number of genes as a banana. Especially considering the confectionary banana is an engineered haploid species and carries about 3 copies of its genome.
Of course it's somewhat different to the comparison between humans and chimps as not only is there a 95-97% match, it's pretty much in the same order, right down to the size of the genome.
2007-12-31 05:28:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You ask that from people that are known to eat babies?
Yes, it's cannibalism... and delicious.
2007-12-30 13:40:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋