He was elected because he was the best choice that we were offered at the time
2007-12-30 01:33:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by kenny p 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
He had an impressive body of operatives assembled for him who were able to steal an election in 2000. In 2004, there was no excuse. It just demonstrates that the majority of Americans were just as aggressively stupid as he is.
And the world is a whole lot less "free" than it was before he and his theocratic regime got ahold of it.
2007-12-30 11:35:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I read this about 6 months ago. Funny how it never got into the papers or news here in the U.S. and most of our liberal news HATES Bush. This has never been verified as the truth.
I'm not saying it isn't the truth I'm saying we don't know for sure.
†
2007-12-30 09:39:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jeanmarie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quite simple,
There was just enough voters that didn't like the strict, business, tight shirt Al Gore.
That feeling has changed, but to late now.
The second election-----As sorry as Bush is, there just wasn't anyone running against him that people liked.
In both elections, Bush didn't win because he was the better choice.
He won because he was the lesser of two evils.
2007-12-30 09:35:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by rangedog 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Society toyed with Communism--now it has toyed with the religious right--both proved disastrous--let's hope we strike a sane balance --the sooner the better!!
2007-12-30 09:41:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by huffyb 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
His statement was televised at the time, but not in America?
I thought your country claims freedom. But now we all know that is not true.
Your country is very heavely censored.
His predecessor proclaimed he was the ruler of the world, while standing in my home country.
Christian tyrrants killing in the name of their god makes them world terrorists..!!
2007-12-30 09:52:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Terry M 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
there are literally no words for that moron or any of the people that follow him.
isn't his IQ like 80? that of a mental retard?
i kind of hope he dies...he has done nothing but destroy innocent people and countries. he is disgusting and evil and will burn in hell with all his ridiculous sheep followers.
2007-12-30 09:33:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by refusedtapout 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I've been asking that for the past 7 years...
2007-12-30 09:44:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by nance223 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
more money
plus
more political power
plus
the ignorance and apathy of the voting public
2007-12-30 09:34:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ever read the hitchhiker trilogy?
Remember the lizards?
There's your answer.
2007-12-30 09:43:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋