Atheists and Agnostics: What evidence do you require to believe that a personal God exists?

Question

Miguel - Don't you hear people say, "I'll BELIEVE it when I see it!"? I don't think that this is a "stupid" question.

Answer 1

show it to me

i want to see it

Answer 2

there is greater advantageous than sufficient evidence for people who're easily looking. The creation speaks of the author. Your lack of ability to verify stems no longer from good judgment or severe thinking, it stems from a loss of excellent judgment and severe thinking. How is technological awareness meant to artwork? technological awareness is meant to be pushed by utilising the evidence, and the hypothesis changed or adjusted based on the evidence. look on the great Bang. that's stated that the great Bang predicts Cosmic history Radiation - that's authentic, however the temperature of the cosmic history radiation envisioned by utilising the great Bang replaced into 50 levels ok. approximately approximately 40 seven levels too warm. (The stable State form additionally envisioned Cosmic history Radiation and a temperature of three levels ok - top on the money). Did the scientists renowned that the stable State form have been given it top? NO, they extra an unprovable assumption - the inflationary era of the great bang. This assumption makes it possible for decrease preliminary temperatures. the difficulty with that's, inflation calls for thus lots greater mass than replaced into stated interior the Universe in an attempt to seize up on the NOW lacking mass they invented dark rely yet yet another assumption consistent with no evidence. Then they stated the purple shift and consistent with their hypothesis that the purple shift = enlargement value and distance chanced on the enlargement of the universe rather of slowing down using gravity, is dashing up.. Their reaction, a clean assumption consistent with 0 evidence - dark power. Then got here evidence that that purple-shift = enlargement value/distance replaced into incorrect (severe redshift products or galaxies bodily interacting with low redshift products or galaxies - impossible if the hypothesis is authentic) Did they then alter that hypothesis? NO they disregarded the evidence.. ok Logical individual, you tell me, whats incorrect with that photograph? in case you a very a logical, severe philosopher you do no longer could desire to think of very long - the great Bang is refuted by utilising the actual evidence and the only element keeping it alive is faith in an unprovable assumption and 'undiscovered evidence' of dark rely and dark power and looking out any opposite direction somewhat than re-examing the purple shift hypothesis. i will supply you this does not coach crea

Answer 3

Think about what you just asked: You put "evidence" and "belief" in the same sentence. Do you know the difference? This is a very stupid question to pose to a non-believer. Whoever said that there are no stupid questions was dead wrong.

Edit: Wrong again, Kidd. If "God" bi*ch-slapped me in the face and I felt the sting, I would not "believe." I would KNOW. That would constitute EVIDENCE, not FAITH. Can you tell the differences now?

Answer 4

a personal god would be one that makes it a point to be involved in my life specifically.

the evolution of a personal god is quite interesting. it started with local deities that were responsible for everyone in a specific town or nation, much like YHWH was responsible for isreal only.

the thing that made christianity stand out among the other mystic religions at the time is that it also gave a personal diety to women, which mithraism and other similiar competeing cults did not.

since women could now also be "saved" they took up the religion. because women did the child-rearing, they taught this personal religion over others which gave christianity a huge advantage.

simply including women gave christianity twice the number of people who could be members.

a brilliant strategy.


take a worls civilizations course. you'll learn that a personal god is simply a manifestation of cultural change.

Answer 5

No evidence will convince a non-believer because their fear of belief creates barriers.
It is easier and more intellectualy acceptable in society to pour scorn on spiritual belief but that is why youths are disaffected, adults are depressed and lonely and we all walk as empty vessels waiting to be filled with the next fashionably "intellectual" theory.
We strive to fulfill our lives with the next acquisition; shoes, jewellery, houses, cars even babies but these do not sustain and eventually the hunger returns and we search once more for something to quiet it's grumble.
All the time desperately trying to ignore the calm, quiet voice from within that could soothe and succour if only we would stop to listen.

Answer 6

agnostics do beleive in a sort of Godly presense dont they??

i know this q. is just one to find out the mind of why others dont beleive in god but thats the thing they need evidence.... when beleiving that God exists is in faith itself doesnt it ? =)

Answer 7

Well I had previously suggested that a god could rearrange the stars to say "Hi this is god" or simultaneously appearing to every single person on the planet and telling them the exact same thing in their relevant language

Answer 8

My simple advise is just to look deep inside one's own heart and see what can fill the void.
I Cr 13;8a

Answer 9

Really all that is required is a religion that offers credibility, meaning a direct experience of God. Mostly what religion (Christianity specifically) offers today is simply dogma.

Answer 10

Nothing would convince me of the existence of the Judeo-Christian deity. Not going to happen -- especially with the "evidence" that has convinced today's Christians.

Answer 11

Just wondering....people don't see their brains, yet they say they have them...they don't see their thoughts, yet they always talk about what they "think"....nobody ever actually sees "qualities" but they still talk about how this or that person has bad or good qualities....same with attitude....so why do they find it so hard to see that Christians believe the same way, by feeling, and by seeing how things and people are affected?