When Christ said (See in details) was he referring to the seperation of church and state?

Question

When Christ said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's" was he referring to the separation of church and state?

I know this is a popular line for discussion about this, to me I think it is very clear that it refers to the separation of church and state, but I'm curious as to what the argument is from someone with a more "Fundamentalist" Christian point of view?

(Please note if your a Christian I have nothing but respect, I really don't appreciate people who answer as if I'm trying to bash their religion)

Answer 1

I would be classified as a "Fundamentalist Christian" by definition. The Bible says what it says and Jesus doesn't leave a lot of room for debate here. It is a bit out of context because the question was about taxes.
The reason for the separation of church and state can be clearly seen today with this new breed of super "All American Republican Conservative Christians" (In that order). These are political people who attach Jesus to their political agenda like a punctuation mark. This is the same thing people do during times of war. They play a GOD card to make their position sound more solid. It's not only not biblical. It flies in the face of everything the Bible says.

That's my opinion as a fundie.

Answer 2

Could be a Church and State item, but the basic lesson is that one is to respect both authorities. Pay the tribute that each asks for. God put both in place, Himself and the government.

On the political front, my opinion, I wish the State would get out of the Church business.

Curious? email is available.

Grace and peace to all.

Answer 3

I think what Jesus meant was that his purpose in life was not to try to form or run the government. He had bigger fish to fry so he was not concerned with those things. The Bible also says that we should follow our governments laws as long as they do not conflict with Gods laws etc. It says nothing about putting the right guy in office etc. From a Christian perspective, it would be selfish to say that only a Christian could run our government correctly. Even a good Christian is still a human being.

Answer 4

No, He was talking about he fact that all men are under other men's laws, & must obey them.

Sort of goes along with this:

Romans 13:1 (New International Version)
New International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society



Romans 13
Submission to the Authorities
1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.

Answer 5

Seperation of Chruch and State comes from a letter written by utilising Thomas Jefferson after his presidency. you're maximum appropriate that the "company clause" does no longer say "Seperation of Church and State". the 1st modification replaced into meant to maintain the U. S. from installation an genuine state faith interior the form of the ecu countries. England had the Church of Enlgand, France replaced into formally Catholic. The Founders needed there to be no state non secular sect and no attempt for human beings entering into government provider. If we glance on the movements of the Founders, they needless to say predicted a minimum of outward non secular form to stay area of government/public existence. They prayed to open/close Congress and maximum State purposes. They allotted PUBLIC treasury money to construct churches! They desperate to no longer tax churches. i think of that what bothers human beings approximately public reflects of religion is they see it as some thing they do no longer seem to be a factor of so evidently that's going to be "discrimination" (yeah, properly i do no longer Medieval gala's using fact they do no longer accurately portray the era so isn't that "discrimination"?). the 1st modification certainly says that we can not give up public reflects of religion on public land. If i choose to circulate have a revival in my city park, and adjust to the enable technique, crowd limits that the city wide-unfold for all purposes, in accordance to the 1st modification, they could't deny me using fact i'm a "fill in non secular association right here".

Answer 6

No he wasn't referring to the separation of church and state.

The context is that the Hebrews were a subjugated culture, under the Romans, and they resented having to pay tax. They wanted to rebel and Jesus was basically telling them that he didn't give a **** about their having to pay tax and other obesience to the Roman state aka Caesar.

Answer 7

He is saying that as Christians, we still have obligations to the state or governing authorities as well as the lord. Paul reiterates this in Romans 13. Separation of church and state is of course an enlightenment era concept to protect religion from state authority. In today's culture, it is seen as protecting the state from religious authority.

Answer 8

This dose not mean separation of church and state. The church had not come into being yet. It did not come until Acts chapter 2

Answer 9

No, it doesn't say a thing about separation of church
and state. It merely means you follow your country's
leader unless it clashes with what God says in His
Word, and then you must choose what God says. He
is Supreme and no one is above God.

Answer 10

It could really much be a case for separation of church and state. Many could interpret it this way and I believe that this would make sense. However, there are many who wil disagree. After all many interpretations have come out of a single passage.