What is the punishment?
2007-12-29 10:52:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
(((Mask))) that sounds like a good punishment. I bet it would deter any future clones.
2007-12-29 10:59:54 · update #1
I wouldn't do it. I think the punishment should be me pulling a big huge mallet out of my pocket - just like in the movie - and hitting the cloner's fingers with it.
(((Vishal)))
2007-12-29 10:58:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it would be unethical to clone someone without that person's consent.
However, cloning (in an of itself) is okay. I believe it will find a place in the Reproductive Health business.
That said, most cloning research focuses on the cloning of certain tissues (and body PARTS), rather than entire humans.
EDIT: oh, and punishment? Well, I guess malpractice, for starters. And perhaps somekind of theft punishment. But what would you do to the clone? Nothing. It would be a human, the same as any other. People don't think about this but a "clone" would be exactly the same as an identical twin. Just born at a different time than the "original."
2007-12-29 10:59:23 · answer #2 · answered by Yinzer from Sixburgh 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am indeed disappointed, Vishal...
once a viable DNA is obtained, *consent* means nothing...
so, religion has nothing to do with consent and the cloning...
cloning is ultimately a dead end street as Dolly has showed us, genetic mistakes are amplified in cloned beings...
the *punishment* is the prevalence of genetic disorders leading to an early death which is overwhelming in cloned beings (vs these born from an union of a sperm and and an egg). So , what exactly religion has to do with all this ?
2007-12-29 11:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cloning a person is wrong. Period. Without their consent? That is way beyond wrong. I have no idea what the punishment would be, but it should be harsh.
2007-12-29 10:57:21 · answer #4 · answered by Tasha 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Um...as extraordinary as that sounds, i've got considered it, and located you to defective. Molestation/rape potential certainly having intercourse. God by no potential had intercourse with Mary, and consequently it does no longer be rape or Molestation. And to boot, Mary isn't/wasn't a baby. She replaced right into a grown lady. i think of he'd be on the intercourse criminal's record if chanced directly to blame (which I doubt could take place, Defence has a reliable case) yet no longer a Pervert or baby Molestor. So...He did no longer RAPE her, yet only used her as a vessle to hold Jesus into the international...tho...that's going to've been truly extraordinary for Mary...
2016-10-20 08:13:07 · answer #5 · answered by ocain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want to clone Thrice, so that I could have my own personal cookie monster... *sigh*
and then I'd clone Riegan 'cause I don't want to share her with Primoa
2007-12-29 10:58:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Punishment?
Eek...I don't really believe in punishment per se.
Education. Restitution.
2007-12-29 10:59:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be a terrible thing to do to someone, the ultimate identity theft, but not sure what an appropriate punishment would be.
2007-12-29 10:58:42 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is wrong to do anything to anyone else's body with out consent.
2007-12-29 11:05:30 · answer #9 · answered by PROBLEM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd probably get upset if out of nowhere I walked in on my boyfriend sleeping with me. Oh the confusion.
2007-12-29 10:59:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋