christians do not do, what that monster did to the world!
2007-12-29 06:34:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hitler would have been labled all three of those, although he was more a dictator than a chancellor. But the behavior of a person neither denies nor confirms the philosophy, religion, or way of life he or she was raised in accordance with. The individual is ultimately responsible for the choices he or she makes and his or her intentions. You can be the most faithful and devout individual in your sect of what ever religion you practice, but if your concsience is not in balance with reality, I think you would be naive to believe that your faith can and will save you.
Osama bin Laden percieves himself as the epitome of devotion to Islam but where is his compassion for fellow man and his conscience. When people overdose on religion, euphoria and emotion replace reason and compassion. Suddenly, proving oneself right to the world takes precedence over mindful living and compassion. That ultimately leads to ignorance and hatred, through which the Hitlers, Osama bin Ladens, and Ann Coulters of the world are born. I mention Ann because even though she's not in a governmental seat of power, one needs only read one page in any book she's written to realize the level of fanaticism she espouses and it's spawned by the same lack of conscience and compassion. I feel confident in saying that no lable exempts one from the undeniable reality which human beings of every circumstancial perception are ultimately faced with. Without mindful living, religious and philosophical devotion means nothing.
2007-12-29 06:40:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kai Dao 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of the above but a Dictator. This is what he used to say:
"Christianity is the hardest blow that ever hit humanity. Bolshevism is the bastard son of Christianity; both are the monstrous issue of the Jews."
Analysis:
He considered Christianity to be wrong because of placing limitations on people's mentality to comply with orders.
He considered Bolshevism to be the product of the Jews because.....(Do your own research)
He considrered Both to be the issue of the Jews because according to his views both had the Jews as originating grounds.
Where he was wrong:
His views on Arianism were based on a mix of ideologies and philosophies of old Sanskrit and contemporanean thoughts of the time. His participation in secret societies, and on the views of Madam Blavatsky, For that reason he did not like Christianity, but still seemed not to deny Jesus as a wise man, mixing all into Aryanism.
You have to understand the mind of Hitler here, He really was a Political Einstein, kind of a devil possesed man with the idea of creating again the greatest empire on Earth (greatest only for Biggest of course), the revival of the Eagle (fallen angels).
I believe that the Aryanism was just a good way to bring youth and men together in a join effort.
But in the end, if he was a Capitalist puppet used perhaps by at least 9 nations**, (Yes is was not just a German issue, DIG and you will find out, or a man working alone, the matter of things is that the forces of evil were manifested on Earth as never seen before.
**It has always been like that, as in the issue of Irak they will see it maybe in the end as an American issue (if God will or man's will), when actually many nations took part on it, You can not change what runs in the blood, you have to clean the blood in the love of God. But there are those who live in a lie and also die in a lie.
And it was for many a punishment from their God (W W II) and for others the elevation of their powers. What he sought to destroy, actually destroyed him, repeating the same old history as in Napoleon.
There are Believers, Idealists, and Doers.
And the Doers have prevailed for a long time, and unless our leaders free themselves from the influences of the current Doers (and become themselves Believers-Idealist-Doers) there will be no more flesh on Earh.
The roads to extinction are multiplying as on a Chess board.
But those who killed by the Word, by the Word shall also perish.
2007-12-29 08:07:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Davinci22 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was raised a Catholic. Understand though that as an adult he dabbled in the occult... so I doubt he was a Christian.
Many may be raised in so called Christian families and not have the foggiest idea what it means to be a Christian.
There are those who are sincere and can be sincerely wrong. Hitler did not follow the words of Jesus... how many times did Jesus say that you will know people by their fruits? What did Hitler teach us?
2007-12-29 06:35:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by onefinefeller 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was a Christian and a Chancellor but not an Aryan though he wanted Germany to be all Aryan. The Aryan race were supposed to be tall, blond and blue-eyed etc. which he wasn't oddly enough lol.
2007-12-29 06:34:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hitler was raised by Roman Catholic parents, but as a boy he rejected some aspects of Catholicism. After Hitler left home, he never attended Mass or received the sacraments.
Throughout his life, Hitler often praised Christian heritage, German Christian culture, and a belief in Jesus Christ. In his speeches and publications Hitler even spoke of Christianity as a central motivation for his antisemitism, stating that "As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice". His private statements, as reported by his intimates, are more mixed, showing Hitler as a religious man but critical of traditional Christianity. However, in contrast to other Nazi leaders, Hitler did not adhere to esoteric ideas, occultism, or neo-paganism, and ridiculed such beliefs in Mein Kampf. Rather, Hitler advocated a "Positive Christianity", a belief system purged from what he objected to in traditional Christianity, and which reinvented Jesus as a fighter against the Jews.
Hitler believed in Arthur de Gobineau's ideas of struggle for survival between the different races, among which the "Aryan race"—guided by "Providence"—was supposed to be the torchbearers of civilization. In Hitler's conception Jews were enemies of all civilization.
Among Christian denominations, Hitler favoured Protestantism, which was more open to such reinterpretations. At the same time, he adopted some elements of the Catholic Church's hierarchical organization, liturgy and phraseology in his politics.
Hitler expressed admiration for the Muslim military tradition. According to one confidant, Hitler stated in private "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness...". Several of Hitler's private statements contradict his public statements regarding Christianity, and indicate his difficulty in reconciling Christian and Nazi philosophy.
"I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so" [Adolph Hitler, to Gen. Gerhard Engel, 1941.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler%27s_religious_beliefs
Should cover everything.
2007-12-29 06:36:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anja 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Christian.
2007-12-29 06:33:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by S K 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually, He was an evil man. He may have used titles, religions or causes to get what he wanted and accomplish his goals but his goals, ideas and deeds were his own.
People usually ask a question like this so that other people can bash religions.
2007-12-29 06:36:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Try more of a Psychopathic nutcase that should of been locked up in a maximium security mental instition
2007-12-29 06:37:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was 1/8 jew about 1/4 catholic and the rest psychotic.
2007-12-29 07:43:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by bocasbeachbum 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was a true Christian and is a hero for Christians
http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm
He killed the jews as the New Testamant and the writings of Christians down the ages, such as Martin Luther have called for
2007-12-29 06:35:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋