2007-12-29 04:52:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Hunting
Great question!
I'd say it would be a toss up between the two;
The hunter gets an extended season to take more game and spend more time enjoying the sport and the insurance companys get to fill out less accident reports and get to pay less money because there would hopefully be less deer to wreck cars on the roads.
You make a very valid point here, great job!
2007-12-29 04:59:34 · answer #1 · answered by boker_magnum 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would be happier no doubt, and hunters/car insurance companies would be happier :)
http://www.usfreeads.com/965924-cls.html Whitetail Deer Hunting Tips
2008-01-01 20:37:58 · answer #2 · answered by HiSee 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both.
For hunters, only if deer population remains stable.
For car insurance companies, only if it leads to less deer related collusion
2007-12-29 18:59:03 · answer #3 · answered by ChaoticChild 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BOTH.* of them would be happier.*
2007-12-29 13:28:07 · answer #4 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hunters. car ins. co's would be pissed cause deer related wrecks would be down.
2007-12-29 13:00:28 · answer #5 · answered by jer8192 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
i would be happer
2007-12-29 13:55:51 · answer #6 · answered by chad s 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋