this is hypothetically speaking so please kids and morons, dont answer with "your so stupid you dont even know horses dont communicate"
2007-12-28 17:33:22 · 29 answers · asked by Dirk 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh, quit horsing around...
2007-12-28 17:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If all living creatures must have a living parent, if living creatures are different, and if simpler forms were around before the more complex forms, then the more complex forms must have come from the simpler forms (e.g., vertebrates from invertebrates). There is simply no other way of dealing reasonably with the evidence we have. Of course, one might deny (as some do) that the layers of the earth represent a succession of very lengthy epochs and claim, for example, that the Grand Canyon was created in a matter of days, but this surely violates scientific observation and all known scientific processes as much as does the claim that, say, vertebrates just, well, appeared one day out of a spontaneous combination of chemicals.
2007-12-29 01:51:22 · answer #2 · answered by elgüero 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since I don't speak horse, I can only speculate and, since horses have never shown an aptitude for science, then my speculation would be that, no, they don't.And, if they did have an aptitude for science, they would have better theories then just the 'donkey to horse' phrase that would be thrown around by the worshipers of the horse God who all refuse to consider anything scientific that suggests anything other then that the horse God made horses out of manure.
2007-12-29 01:37:11 · answer #3 · answered by Demopublican 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I hate to be a neigh-sayer, but...
Horses and donkeys share a common ancestor, like apes and humans. So the more educated horses would spend their time pointing that out. However, donkeys, being stubborn, wouldn't listen anyway.
And let us not forget zebras, onagers, and other members of the genus Equidae.
2007-12-29 01:42:18 · answer #4 · answered by link955 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If they could talk to each other they would agree they are both descendants of eohippus, the "dawn horse" unless they were creationists in which case they would agree they were created separately by Epona.
Of course they may disagree and get into the whole creationism - evolution argument. Perhaps they do and we just don't understand what they are neighing.
2007-12-29 01:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by freebird 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually according to the Bible it would be the Donkeys that would do all the talking. But I don't think that horses are bright enough to understand evolution. So no.
2007-12-29 01:38:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Horse sense says they evolved from a common ancestor.
2007-12-29 01:36:42 · answer #7 · answered by novangelis 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
No, horses have no need to know "why" and "how" and don't come up with invisible horses in the sky that created them.
2007-12-29 01:45:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe horses evolved from anything. I don't know maybe a unicorn??
2007-12-29 01:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by SMX™ -- Lover Of Hero @};- 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think donkeys evolved from horses-- you don't see people riding donkeys do you?
2007-12-29 01:43:33 · answer #10 · answered by cedykeman1 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hypothetically speaking... no, they would say they evolved from a common ancestor - but there is always some *** who wouldn't believe it.
2007-12-29 01:36:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋