Yes, a religious person can be a true patriot or citizen in a secular nation. Not all religions believe in forcing others to follow their beliefs. Some religions do not have tenets that would cause a conflict of interests.
Even religious people who follow a religion that promotes forcing others to follow their beliefs COULD be a good leader and not follow those tenets of their religion. That would need to be judged on an individual basis.
2007-12-28 10:39:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Witchy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religious people follow their doctrines according to their religion. Every individual religion has their right to practice their doctrine in America whether agreeable or not to the population.
Example: KKK practice their religion to HATE everybody that is not white.
I can honestly tell you that those people that have an alternative agenda can not be trusted to act as true citizens or patriots.
Islamic radicals have proven that theory and so did the Oklahoma boomers.
Religion is not always represented by its true meaning because to many people use religion as their front to disguise their true agenda (HATE).
Religion has nothing to do with being a true citizen or a good patriot to your country or the world.
A true citizen or patriot comes from the heart and soul not from religion.
A true citizen or patriot no matter what country you live in works to better their country men towards peace and prosperity regardless of their differences.
PLEASE DON'T BLAME RELIGION FOR THE TROUBLES OF THE WORLD.
Blame the INDIVIDUALS that practice HATE and all the INIQUITIES in the world.
Remember that not all people are religious with a "RELIGION", but religious in the HOLY SPIRIT AND THE HOLY SCRIPTURES (The Holy Bible).
GOD BLESS! AMEN! SHALOM!
2007-12-28 10:07:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My deities require that we give honor to our families, our deities, our community. We have a responsibility to all of those and not in that order.
I am a United States Marine Corps veteran. I joined when I was a Christian. I wasn't sure if i could take a human life if war broke out but knew going in that it might come to that and accepted it.
Now, as a heathen, I wouldn't want to kill but not because I have a religious conflict against serving my country or killing in war or self defense.
I know a number of heathens, pagans and Wiccans that do what they feel is good service to the country, cities and mankind - some trying to stop the war, some working with veterans, some doing prison outreach, some working in soup kitchens.
I know some pagans and Wiccans would refuse to fight in the current war, some are already serving. I think it depends on the person and how they view their religion.
I'm not sure I'd know of a situation where a conflict between my religion and my nation would arise, I think they go hand-in-hand.
2007-12-28 09:20:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aravah 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who defines what acting like a patriot is? A religious person would probably tell you that their religion is a guide to what is right. Doing what is right sounds patriotic to me.
Can you provide an example of a "conflict of interest"?
My guess is that any example you provide would have multiple interpretations regarding what is most patriotic or what is in the country's best interest. And this would happen just as much with a group of athiests as with a group of ministers or priests.
I can't speak for any religion but my own, but the religion that I know is not competing for power with states. It's interest is in salvation beyond this world, not gaining power and influence within it. I simply don't see the conflict you are refering to.
2007-12-28 09:01:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by HokiePaul 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Simplifying this I will let you know that if, for example ALL CHTISTIANS, were to be TRUE CHRISTIANS and follow JESUS teachings to the dot, then no single one of them would be involved in politics in the first place!!!! This not only goes for all "government" officials, political candidates, etc., but the public itself. Why?
Because Christians are to believe that Jesus Christ's government, ruling, or whatever it is called, it is definetely not from, about, or of this WORLD. He himself explained this repeatedly.
Now, since Christians just like all religious groups, use RELIGION as they see fit, well then all of Jesus teaching have to go somewhere where they don't bother too much, and then his followers can do whatever they want!!!!
There are those that indeed wait for his return, go to Church, do good deeds, try not to sin too much, etc. But in the greater part most Christians just live it up in the world just like any other group. So you don't need to fear any "UNPATRIOTIC" anything from them. Same for other religions.
MUSLIMS? Well I tend to think most Muslims are not American born, so we can't expect them to be more patriotic than those that are. And of course, if they hear their "calling"_such as was the case w/ many Bin Laden followers, they will FOLLOW their roots, tradition, instinct, or whatever you call it.
It is not RELIGION that comes first, it is whatever group of individuals see fit!!!!
2007-12-28 09:13:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by 1-2informationalways 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
*** re chap. 28 pp. 191-192 par. 20 Contending With Two Ferocious Beasts ***
Putting love of country ahead of love of God is not what true Christian do.. Most people love the land of their birth. As good citizens, true Christians also respect the rulers and the emblems of the country where they reside, obey the laws, and make a positive contribution to the welfare of their community and their neighbors. (Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-17) They cannot, however, give blind devotion to one country as against all others. “Our country, right or wrong” is not a Christian teaching. So Christians who worship Jehovah God cannot share in giving prideful patriotic worship to any part of the wild beast, for this would amount to worshiping the dragon (Satan)—the source of authority of the beast(Earthly kingdoms in power-including United states and UK as the world power. They cannot ask admiringly: “Who is like the wild beast?” Rather, they follow the example of Michael—his name meaning “Who Is Like God?”—as they uphold Jehovah’s universal sovereignty. At God’s appointed time, this Michael, Christ Jesus, will do battle with the wild beast and conquer it, even as he triumphed in expelling Satan from heaven.—Revelation 12:7-9; 19:11, 19-21.
So this being said, true Christians give respect and pay what they are ask of them and follow the laws of the land except when it interferes with Gods Laws. True Christian are neutral to world politics. They will not take arms against anyone. You cannot love mankind and kill them.
2007-12-29 09:20:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by omega_cage 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't see anything Biblically that suggests
soldiers or Centurions, after their conversion, kept
to their older ways. In fact, if we look at history,
we see the opposite:
"A careful review of all the information
available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus
Aurelius [Roman emperor from 161 to 180 C.E.], no
Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after
becoming a Christian, remained in military service."
-The Rise of Christianity(London, 1947), E. W. Barnes,
p. 333.
"We who were filled with war, and mutual
slaughter, and every wickedness, have each through the
whole earth changed our warlike weapons,-our swords
into ploughshares, and our spears into implements of
tillage,-and we cultivate piety, righteousness,
philanthropy, faith, and hope, which we have from the
Father Himself through Him who was crucified."-Justin
Martyrin "Dialogue With Trypho, a Jew" (2nd century
C.E.), The Ante-NiceneFathers (Grand Rapids, Mich.;
reprint of 1885Edinburgh edition), edited by A.
Roberts and J. Donaldson, Vol. I, p. 254.
"They refused to take any active part in the civil
administration or the military defence of the
empire. . . . it was impossible that the Christians,
without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume
the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of
princes."-History ofChristianity (New York, 1891),
Edward Gibbon, pp. 162, 163.
Why is this? "They are not of the world even as I
[Jesus] am not of the world. "John 17:16
"Jesus therefore perceiving that they were about to
come and take him by force, to make him king, withdrew
again into the mountain himself alone." John 6:15
Later, he told the Roman governor:
"Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if
my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants
fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but
now is my kingdom not from hence." John 18:36
But why? Matthew 4: 8 and 9 shows Satan trying to
tempt Jesus, "Again, the Devil took him along to an
unusually high mountain, and showed him all the
kingdoms of the world and their glory, and he said to
him: "All these things I will give you if you fall
down and do an act of worship to me."
Think about it! How could the devil offer
Jesus the kingdoms of the world, if they were not in
his control already? That is why 1John5:19 says, "the
whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one."
Satan is also called "the ruler of this world" and
"the god of this world" (John 14:30; 2Cor 4:4).
Jas. 4:4: "Adulteresses, do you not know that the
friendship with the world is enmity with God?
Whoever, therefore, wants to be a friend of the world
is constituting himself an enemy with God."
And finally,
The Christian Century: "The earliest Christians did
not serve in the armed forces. Roland Bainton notes
that 'from the end of the New Testament period to the
decade A.D. 170-180 there is no evidence whatever of
Christians in the army.' . . . Only gradually did
Christians abandon their opposition to military
service . . . Once Augustine endorsed 'just war' as
authorizing Christians' participation in military
activities, 'just war' soon became whatever war their
government engaged in."
The article then exposes the real issue for
Christians: "Can anyone seriously conceive of Jesus
hurling hand grenades at his enemies, using a machine
gun, manipulating a flamethrower, dropping nuclear
bombs or launching an ICBM which would kill or cripple
thousands of mothers and children? . . . If Jesus
could not do this and be true to his character, then
how can we do it and be true to him?"
"Augustine's 'just war' perversion of Christianity
on this critical issue was the greatest calamity that
ever befell the faith. It has cost Christians endless
opportunities to witness for their central ethical
principle: love your enemies and do good to them who
despitefully use you. It may have done as much to
hamper Christian evangelism as anything that has ever
occurred."
Christians SHOULD be no part of worldly politics, having nothing to do with it's conflicts and hostility. A christians loyalty should be to God's kingdom with his son as reigning king.
2007-12-28 09:20:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by walterprognosticus 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Patriot? NO. Citizen? Yes.
True Christians are to obey Jesus in everything. The world is fond of it's own. We are no part of the world just as he is no part of the world. (John 15:19; 17:16) Indeed, Jesus reasoned if his Kingdom were part of this world, his attendants would have fought for him when he was arrested. His Kingdom is no part of this world. (john 18:36)
So while we give Caesar's things to Caesar, but God's things to God, we obey world government's laws as long as they do not conflict with God's laws.
2007-12-28 13:15:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by grnlow 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do not believe that any one who puts their interests first be they religious, political or financial can be a true patriot. That is why I do not consider Bush a patriot as he puts all three ahead of the interest of the USA.
2007-12-28 09:11:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by James E Lewis AKA choteau 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Jesus Christ himself said that his kingdom is "No part of this world.'- John 18:36. Also, he said that his followers should also be no part of this world- John 17:16. Therefore, Christians should have nothing to do with politics,they should be politically neutral. They know that only God's kingdom, with Christ as king, will be the answer to mankinds problems. Jesus taught his followers to pray for this kingdom in Matthew 6:9 &10. The Bible say's that God's kingdom will 'crush' and put an end to all of mankinds kingdoms/governments - Daniel 2:44.
2007-12-28 09:16:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋