okay. here we are. we smile when happy, breathe, eat and much more. If you remove our heart we dont work. if you break apart a part we dont work. so how is it possible for us to come out of a big exposion? I see no reality do you? Doesnt this call for something bigger. Something called G-O-D?! what do you say?
2007-12-28
07:09:42
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
also to those who ask i have read up on this. adam was not created of dirt. god made him
2007-12-28
07:29:46 ·
update #1
to juicy- you forgot to mention heart, arteries, veins, and much more.
2007-12-28
07:39:08 ·
update #2
to thatrich... so you go make me a person. you obviously know how.... which is easier to believe? that paragraph you wrote or god made it.
2007-12-28
07:43:40 ·
update #3
Yep, it takes MORE faith to believe that we came from some cosmic BANG, than it does to simply believe how God says it actually happened.
2007-12-28 07:12:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by goinupru 6
·
4⤊
10⤋
If you take the bible literally We do come from dirt:
Genesis 2:7
7 the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
Footnotes:
1. Genesis 2:7 The Hebrew for man (adam) sounds like and may be related to the Hebrew for ground ( adamah it is also the name Adam (see Gen. 2:20).
You also don't seem to grasp the big bang theory either. It posits that the universe was created by a rapid expansion of matter. Why, could just as well be God as any other source. Matter first became stars. Over vast eons stars went nova and super nova creating heavier elements which became planets. On planets where the circumstances were right life evolved. On our world eventually humans evolved. There is an immense gap of time between the big bang and what your parents did to make you. Who's to say it wasn't and still isn't being guided by some vast consciousness?
2007-12-28 07:53:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by hairypotto 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your concept is flawed.
Remove a leg, I am still human.
Remove both, and both arms as well, I am still human.
Consider Stephen Hawking. His body is little more than a malfunctionig life-support system for his brain, and he is still human.
Even a person with sever brain-damage is still considered human.
So, there is no single part, or even a combination of certain parts that makes us what we are.
We are a synergy, something greater than the sum of it's parts.
This does not, neccessarily, mean that we are divinely created.
After all, every laser beam ever made in a lab is also a synergy. Diamonds are a synergy. Heck, magnetic poetry is a synergy.
2007-12-28 07:15:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by juicy_wishun 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
A big explosion released an unfathomable amount of material and energy. The material was subatomic particles at first, which would form into elements. We know from high school chemistry class that elements bond with other elements to form molecules. Over the course of billions of years you have molecules coming into contact with one another and you had various amounts of energy being added from the outside environment. The number of these interactions throughout the universe is beyond the scope of the human mind, so we might as well say they were pseudo-infinite. Have you ever heard that quote about a million monkeys typing randomly into typewriters for a million years, and how they would create Shakespeare? Well the creation of life is something like that. Take trillions of trillions of interactions between molecules, and eventually you're going to get some very complex molecules, and eventually those complex molecules will be what we call amino acids, the building blocks of life. Creating life is the most important step, but also important is creating life that can sustain and replicate itself. It's quite possible that life was created more than once, maybe even billions or trillions of times, but only some forms of life created were able to reproduce (once again, if you have enough lifeforms, eventually some will have the physical properties that allow for reproduction). The reproducing lifeforms interacted with their environment, and that's where the evolution of living things really kicks in, as certain types of reproducing lifeforms thrived over others and species began to differentiate. I'm still talking about simple organisms here, such as bacteria. This may have happened on a planet we call Earth, or it may have happened elsewhere on a rock that would crash into Earth and spread its lifeforms on our planet. The lifeforms would continue to adapt and evolve over time, growing more and more complex and specialized for their specific environment. We believe that life was first present on our planet around 3 billion years ago, which leaves a lot of time for evolution to create the amazingly complex life that we see on our planet today. So, you see, it is possible for us to come from a big explosion; it just takes a lot of material, a lot of energy, and perhaps most importantly a lot of time. Nearly all scientists can agree that our universe has had these 3 things.
2007-12-28 07:37:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by thatrichguy 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hmm, what I currently do not understand I should attribute to God. It doesn't matter that I am not a physicist, nor even think that I could be wrong. No I am going to argue from a state of ignorance and just put A answer in there instead of the correct one.
Thank god scientists keep searching for answers instead of attributing sickness, quality of life, economics, biology, technology etc. to God when they do not understand something.
With people like you, science comes to a complete halt.
2007-12-28 07:14:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lynus 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
What exactly is your question? How could someone survive an explosion? It happens, either by the grace of God or dumb luck or some other protective element that we're unaware of such as perfect placement or positioning or some such thing that shields you physically from the death blow. It doesn't have to mean that there was divine intervention.
2007-12-28 07:54:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♛Qu€€n♛J€§§¡¢a♛™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The origin of life and how the universe was formed have nothing to do with each other. Your argument is hereby debunked.
"Adam didn't come from dirt, God made him?"
Um, "And the LORD God formed man of the DUST of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;" Genesis 2:7
2007-12-28 07:38:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The big bang story doesn't add up . Everybody knows some big bloke made people out of mud . That makes much more sense than that evolution stuff that's only believed by all those of any intelligence . All the rest of us go for that mud story ,
2007-12-28 07:22:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Just by looking at some of the questions you answer, I can tell you're one of these religious fanatics. What do you care what others believe as long as your own beliefs are in check?
2007-12-28 07:16:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by juniorsweapon 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Category mistake!
2007-12-28 07:27:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't mean to sound rude, but you are obviously not a cosmologist, physicist, biologist, or member of any of the other sciences studying the beginning of the universe or abiogenesis.
Your lack of understanding is, thus, understandable. Please don't use your lack of expertise as the basis of your world view.
2007-12-28 07:15:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Phoenix: Princess of Cupcakes 6
·
7⤊
1⤋