2007-12-27 18:08:01 · 13 answers · asked by ThatOneDude 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No he would not have.
2007-12-27 18:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by question212 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Carter has been involved in a variety of national and international public policy, conflict resolution, human rights and charitable causes. Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. President Carter is a recipient of the Albert Schweitzer Prize for Humanitarianism.
He and his wife are also well-known for their work as volunteers with Habitat for Humanity, a program that helps low income working people to build and purchase their own home. (500,000+ homes)
2007-12-27 19:26:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The weakest part of the man's Presidency was his foreign policy, and you're asking if he'd have made a better Secretary of Staten than a President.
2007-12-27 19:01:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Jimmy Carter.
2007-12-27 18:17:41 · answer #4 · answered by belle 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Better still how about a zoo keeper?. Since he was such a monkey with a peanut plantation. Be side, he got a lot of laughs.
.
2007-12-27 18:17:16 · answer #5 · answered by Bee Bee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, He needs to stay out of politics.
2007-12-31 07:09:05 · answer #6 · answered by the d 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should have stayed on the farm. His brother Billy would have been the better President.
2007-12-30 23:23:48 · answer #7 · answered by Jake S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh no! He did not belong in politics at any level. Even now he does more harm to this country by opening his mouth.
2007-12-27 20:58:54 · answer #8 · answered by Bette 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He would have made a better peanut farmer. He never belonged in polotics especially at the international level.
2007-12-27 18:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by okrife 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
He'd be considered a great prez compared to Bush
2007-12-27 19:23:12 · answer #10 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He should've just stayed on the peanut farm.
2007-12-27 18:14:24 · answer #11 · answered by Adolf Schmichael 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋