http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071123/NATION/111230087/1002
2007-12-27 16:03:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Democrats are the party for the rich who want to keep others from becoming rich. Republicans believe in allowing people to earn wealth, regardless of current class status.
Elites believe in keeping the number of wealthy down. They do not want others to make it and get laws passed to make it harder and harder to create wealth.
2007-12-27 16:09:52 · answer #1 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
40% of a million dollars leaves one with $600K to spend. 40% of $100K leaves one with $60K to spend. The problem with Democrats is that they consider anyone who is successful to be rich and lump people making $100,000 in with the Bill Gates and Warren Buffet crowd. Obama keeps talking about people making $75K as being wealthy. Since he feels that way, reduce all Congressional salaries to $75K and let them see how far that gets an individual living in the DC Metro area.
They are the party of parasites and losers. Pay for my health care so I can get a big screen TV and then default on the payments.
2007-12-27 16:17:36 · answer #2 · answered by Return of Bite My Shiny Metal... 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it is no shock here. in 2000 and 2004 the majority of ceo's voted democrat. the nations richest people are democrat. the democrats have passed laws to help big business. they passed a bill that allowed companies not to pay retirees health benefits.
2007-12-27 16:13:08 · answer #3 · answered by rap1361 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act signed by Eisenhower. Founded the KKK.
2007-12-27 16:14:33 · answer #4 · answered by phillipk_1959 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
America is known for FREEDOM and LIBERTY something that was and has always been a symbol of AMERICAN ideals, our value system and even synonymous with the AMERICAN way of life.
Hillary "Hitlery" Clinton- Before everyone in the Honda Prius F**k BUSH bumper sticker global warming club breaks their ankle jumping on the Hitlery "Socialist-Elitist" Clinton bandwagon here are a few things you might want to google:
Hillary Clinton: Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, Rupert Murdoch Hillary Fund Raiser, North American Union (NAU), Amero Declinig Dollar.
Bill Clinton: NAFTA, Trilateral Commission, Rhodes Scholar Cecil Rhodes, Bohemian Grove.
And I don't want to hear that crap about "Things used to be all peaceful and prosperous when Bill was in office " Bull S**t bombs fell on Iraq from when Poppa Bush was in Office through the entire Clinton era, they didn't make CNN everyday but it is recorded history, and Thank Bill Gates for the 90's tech boom NOT Bill Clinton.
GOOGLE RUPERT MURDOCH HILARY FUNDRAISER then delete your question.
CBS article titled:
Rupert Murdoch Loves Hillary Clinton
Conservative Media Mogul To Host Fundraiser For Liberal N.Y. Senator
Here is Hitlery @ the CFR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irGLv6xLFxU
Here is Cheney talking about concealing his CFR membership from voters in his hometown...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOAk-7F1EVU
«:::R:::»
«:::O:::»
«:::N:::»
'08
«:::P:::»
«:::A:::»
«:::U:::»
«:::L:::»
2007-12-27 16:07:20 · answer #5 · answered by RON PAUL for President 2008 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
parties in general are for the rich and the powerful. i am liberal, but in no way do i support Democrats because of their party.
2007-12-27 16:10:07 · answer #6 · answered by wagnonpegs 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because im one! duh. jkjk
2007-12-27 16:08:05 · answer #7 · answered by RPM 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋