Im thinking people who were fans of his are hoping for a 3rd term in a round about way. He already admitted he might sit in on a cabinet meeting. I don't think he'd be happy fading in the background like most first wives have done in recent history.
Im a woman and I don't want the first woman President getting in office purely on her husbands accomplishments or Charisma. I want her to be a strong leader herself and I don't see it in her.
Look at all of what Eleanor Roosevelt accomplished during her husbands Presidancy and look at what Hillary accomplished in her husbands two terms. Don't tell me men held her back when Mrs Roosevelt wasn't held back decades ago. Hillary just didn't try hard enough when she had her chance. Or wasn't passionate enough about a cause.
2007-12-27 14:23:53 · 12 answers · asked by Kat 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. And I wont vote for her because she is Bill's wife either.
2007-12-27 14:26:36 · answer #1 · answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is a distinctive individual to bill, yet confident of direction he would be a potential. Is it a sturdy situation? i could say sound financial administration, in charge financial coverage, growing to be wages, lowering poverty, certainly being respected by means of the international, searching down terrorist quite of illegally invading unrelated sovereign countries - ie each and all the failings Clinton grew to become into time-honored for - could be sturdy. no count number if Hillary will furnish them besides as bill did is the sole question.
2016-10-20 03:02:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eleanor Roosevelt accomplished all of that because of her husband. Roosevelt would ask eleanor for help all the time, even to chosing what to wear.
On the other hand, Bill didn't run the country by being hillary's little b*tch.
thats the difference
2007-12-27 14:33:13 · answer #3 · answered by LIVE 4 SOMETHIN OR DIE 4 NOTHIN 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Good Question.
Greetings.
From United Kingdom.
2007-12-27 14:28:17 · answer #4 · answered by ƟƝƂƏƙƎƝƉƐ ƘƦăƒƑƭƐƃƖƞĝ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I like Bill, but I am not fond of Hilary. That's why I haven't planned on voting for her. But people need to look at Hilary by herself. Not attached to Bill. The problem is people can't think about one without the other.
2007-12-27 14:31:36 · answer #5 · answered by Senator D*L*P™ 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't believe that people are looking for a Clinton 3rd term and I definitely don't believe no one will vote for her because she's Bill's wife. I won't be voting for her at all.
Hillary is a Senator and has her own credentials, independent of Bill.
2007-12-27 14:29:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Would people still vote for her? Who plans on voting for her now? She has over 40% negitive rating.
2007-12-27 15:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She would have gone up a notch if she'd have dumped his butt after what he pulled, but I believe she was right up to her neck in it too and she's the absolute last person I'd want to see in the White House, except maybe for that ambulance chaser that's running against her
2007-12-27 14:29:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
she was part of last good administration that only happened cause she was first lady. If it was not her then somebody from that era would run on his record which was good made to look better by gonzo's extreme failure
2007-12-27 14:34:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Hillary's last name wasn't Clinton, she wouldn't be a senator.
2007-12-27 14:30:52 · answer #10 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋