2007-12-27 13:38:52 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It means more trouble in the east..As bloody usual.... As they are to backward to want peace.
2007-12-27 14:01:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
To me personally and directly, I can't say it means anything...and I don't mean to sound callous, but it was to be expected...honestly, with the ever present threats and that first assassination attempt upon her return to Pakistan (never mind the legacy of the Bhutto family in the country), I think we all knew that she would get caught sooner or later. Even if she had made it to the elections and won her third mandate as PM, I don't think she would have survived the threats for too long. This is not to say that her death is not sad news...I mean nobody wants to hear of anyone being killed...but realistically we couldn't have really anticipated her to survive.
Having said that though, the implications of her death on the world stage are potentially more troubling. While we will never know if the allegations against her or her family were true or if she really could have turned the tide on the terrorist juggernaut that continues to threaten world security, the fact remains that she was a polarizing force for both her supporters and her haters (including Al-Qaeda) - not only in Pakistan (a nuclear nation already on the brink) but abroad as well. It's been a while since a politician of her calibre and charisma has been assassinated (Rabin being the last one I can think of) - and given the current state of affairs in the Middle East and the War on Terror (particularly in Afghanistan where the Taliban has seen a sort of resurgence which could likely gain more momentum with the continuing instability and chaos in Pakistan and may even get its hands on some of those nuclear weapons), her death today may have made the world a more dangerous place to be in...
2007-12-27 22:56:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The US designs for Pakistan are in progress & very much in right direction. Yes, so it is!
Benazir or not, they wanted to destabilized Ex-Military President by one political party getting reasonable majority which the President Musharraf never wanted therefore he allowed Nawaz Sharif to contest elections.
After the incidence Nawaz Sharif has announced not to participate in elections, thus, all the sympathies of public will be with People Party & they will get the most votes and a reasonable majority.
Taliban are in my opinion are not that simple otherwise NATO & US forces would have gotten rid of them in Afghanistan & they would never have pored into Pakistan!
Uncle Sam is winning.
2007-12-28 01:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by Habib 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
from what i am hearing she was a good women, that in the end put her life on the line for her beloved country. she was really brave, and is a example to all women across the world. i think that her ideals will stay with the world for a long time. all she wanted was to improve the country she loved. she was what u call a true patriot for her country. i haven't know much about her, but i will now learn as much as i can about her. she was an example, not only to Muslim women but to all women around the world. she was and still is the 1st women in a Muslim country to ever be in such a high political position, she was prime minister. i hope this will help, not scare Muslim women, to see that they have the power to say and do a bit more then allowed. that we women, unknowing to men truly keep the world running and keep it held together. unlike men that force things, we tend to care more and sacrifice more, when we truly care. she was a true mytar, but she did it for a good cause, unlike those that die for bad reasons. also, we as Americans must realize that there is a difference between a good Muslim and a bad one, not all Muslims are bad or evil. i hope that one day we can learn to tolerate and respect each other believes.
2007-12-27 22:09:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I knew someone wanted her head even before she arrived in Pakistan. She should have just stayed away; changing the way a country operates during wartime is never popular. The true enemies of democracy, the fundamentalists in the mosques and hills, have done a fabulous job of smearing this all over Musharraf's presidency.
Her death means a victory for the enemy to me, and a great excuse to beef up the effort to kill them- alqaeda.
2007-12-27 22:37:58 · answer #5 · answered by bablshams 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sadness that once again, an extremist has stopped (or at least attempted to stop) rational thought. When daftly, will only go to make her a martyr for her cause and will no doubt now will definitely make her thoughts live on ... stupid thinking from stupid people ... sad.
At least two people die for no reason, is what I think.
As a person, she is a loss to the World.
2007-12-27 21:46:08 · answer #6 · answered by brianthesnailuk2002 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would imagine most freedom loving people feel a great loss and fear of things to come as Islamic fundamentalism murders its way into the corridors of power.
Unfortunately,if bhutto ever regained power,she had intention of expelling "secretly operating" american forces and CIA agents from pakistan.I take this as a bad omen.Without western resources,pakistan would have zero hope of holding back the cancer of fundamentalism,since a huge slice of Pakistan actually supports it.
Of course the expected civil unrest will result in a million refugees heading straight for ...yes you guessed..england.
2007-12-27 22:00:21 · answer #7 · answered by Private 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well........it just makes me feel a bit sympathetic towards her.....i dont really know much about her but from what ive heard on the news....she seemed like a good powerful lady and to say that she just got shot!
I feel kind of tight on her !
2007-12-27 21:43:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am saddened by the cowardly murder of a courageous woman trying to bring democracy to Pakistan.
2007-12-28 04:13:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The loss of a woman who made it in a male dominated job.
2007-12-28 09:08:13 · answer #10 · answered by Grace 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋