2007-12-27 13:29:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary? Ethical? I almost got a hernia laughing!
2007-12-27 13:34:27 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't think you'll find anyone who will accuse Hillary of being ethical. She's the antithesis of ethical. She has her own personal code of conduct and determines whether something is right or wrong based on whether it furthers her own personal interests. If it helps her get what she wants, it's right and if it doesn't it's wrong. She's never personally responsible for anything bad that her staff does on her behalf. There's always someone else to take the blame.
2007-12-27 22:19:30 · answer #2 · answered by S C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody believes she is ethical, or even suggesting she is ethical. Politics is politics. There are so many old cliche about politics, and there is truth in most of them. What does she have to fear about doing it anyway? Nothing she can do will surprise the Obama camp. They are ready for her best low down tactic.
2007-12-27 21:53:12 · answer #3 · answered by igdubya 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Welcome to "Decision 2008" We'll hear plenty of dirt on all the candidates, probably enough dirt on them all to make Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton, and Britney Spears look like nuns. If Hillary doesnt win, and Obama gets the nomination, you will be sure that the Republican opponent will release the info.
2007-12-27 21:45:16 · answer #4 · answered by kris76 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely it's ethical in a very politically unethical way...
how ethical is it to run for president using an over-paid, mediocre, journalist's (Oprah) money? He can't feel good about people voting for Oprah and her using his name to get on the ballot, could he?.. Oprama - that has an interesting ring :-)
2007-12-27 21:40:27 · answer #5 · answered by LOVEISTHEANSWER 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like America to know all the dirt on all the candidates. Better in the elections than while in office.
If it comes from Hillary or a newspaper, I don't care. Is it true? That's the question.
2007-12-27 21:33:52 · answer #6 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The words Hillary & ethical do not belong in the same sentance...
2007-12-27 21:54:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fine let her do it and be done with it.
The fact that her campaign lost its chief campaign manager in accusing Obama of being a drug dealer. Obama lost two minutes of one day. But the campaign chief lost his title and position.
Surely Hilary's campaign learned something there.
2007-12-27 21:38:05 · answer #8 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but very few politicians are. i personally don't see the point in threatening to release information, rather than just releasing it.
2007-12-27 21:35:05 · answer #9 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think we need this example to make our minds up for us. Sure its ethical to do so, and I bet Obama wont go whining about how he is being attacked.
2007-12-27 21:34:04 · answer #10 · answered by Bistro 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋