8 teams, 6 BCS conference champs get in, the top 2 teams get 2 byes, the top 4 BCS conference champs get a bye. A none BCS team can get an at large if they finish in the top 10.
w= winner AL=At large
Example:
Final
1 vs w 2 vs w
4 vs w 3 vs w
5 vs AL 6 vs AL
Example using this years teams:
Title game Winner of Game E vs F
(Game E)Ohio vs w of C (Game F) LSU vs w of D
(Game C)Oklahoma vs w of A (GameD)VT vs w of B
(Game A)USC vs Hawaii (Game B)WVU vs Georgia
Essentially a none BCS team would need to win 3 games in a row to make it to the title game but lets face it they would need to beat 3 contendors under the current system for the computers to allow them into the final.
You can name the bowls according todays system AKA game E could be the ROSE Bowl etc.
2007-12-27 12:48:36 · 3 answers · asked by NCAAF Fan 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I disagree. I say the NCAA should establish a 16-team playoff consisting of the eleven conference champions (yes including the lowly Sun Belt champs) and five at-large berths.
2007-12-27 16:45:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even with your playoff system you are doing the same thing that the BCS does, and that is keeping the lower schools from having the opportunity at a national championship. Hawaii is not even ranked in the top 10 (#11), so you would keep them out of the tournament.
16 teams, every conference winner (yes, even the sun belt conference) and then the top 5 teams after that.
2007-12-27 16:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by three11stu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea, but the powers that be will never go in for playoffs.
2007-12-27 12:53:34 · answer #3 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋