She obvously maried Charles for his money/power rather than his charm or looks and I defy anyone to say otherwise
It is apparent to me that Harry is James Hewits love child every time I look at him-just one of her many lovers
She posed beside some land mines-woooo, roll out the parade for St Diana
She was seriously schitso and recent publishings of her letters prove this.
She tried to take down the Royal family by way of media-the most sly way of doing so
2007-12-27 12:22:57 · 14 answers · asked by Glenn F 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
It's pretty obvious what Diana was like. Some people won't accept the truth. They need her to be this wonderful person rather than the rather manipulative shallow neurotic woman she was. Let them have their silly illusions. Every era gets the heroes and heroines it deserves and a sick, media-obsessed era gets Diana.
2007-12-27 12:37:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Sorry Glen but there are some people such as myself who try and can look past a persons looks and see ones heart.
In think Diana did that with Charles as I believe he mainly is a good person but, with the formality of Royalty and maybe being a mama's boy made him a pansy in some areas of his private life. He didn't have the rocks enough to go to his mother to tell her he was in love with Camilla tho I bet the Queen knew this all the while, yet permitted the marriage.
I think Diana truly loved Charles but got in over her head as to the in-laws. Guess you forgot about Charles tape phone conversation with Camilla wanting to be a Tampon so Camilla could use him.. If THATS not out there as to wacko I don't know what is.
Red hair is no proof Harry is the son of another without a DNA test.. speculate all you want too as red hair can be found on both sides of the family's.
I'm glad that Diana took up the cause of Land-mines after the divorce..it was a cause that made her happy and she helped many.
But we all know Diana had her faults too and was no saint, tho I bet she would still be alive today if Charles would had been honest with her from the start.
The British Royal family took themselves down with their rules on how and who one is to love.
2007-12-27 21:02:53 · answer #2 · answered by A Messi No More 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
But what difference does it make?
She was popular, but nobody is going to give her sainthood.
She wasn't even Catholic. I doubt the Pope, John Paul II or Benedict the whateverth, has any plans, whatsoever of conferring sainthood on her.
Oh, and just because somebody claims to have bedded a woman, doesn't mean they did. Didn't you go to High School? It's terribly common for guys to try to ruin a girl/woman's reputation by saying that. Anyone can say so. Let them prove it somehow. (she weren't no angel, either)
Here's a thought: let let her rest in peace already. I think it's all been enough.
P.S. She DID do some very good things, and who's to say that the Royal Family didn't deserve a little taking down?
2007-12-27 23:36:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Her family had money. Her Grandmother set her and Charles up together. She was 19 when she married him. Please, she had to love him to believe that she would spend the rest of her life with him. When she married him they thought they could never divorce. He lied to her from the start to please his parents. He was wishy washy and couldn't make up his mind. Despite his looks he was the catch because he is a Royal. That is not an easy life for anyone. Your whole life in the public eye. Everything you do, say, wear etc. scrutinized. She had no idea until it was too late that Charles had lied to her and not given up Camilla.
I to think Harry looks alot like James Hewitt but Diana's sisters and her brother are both redheads so you can't go by the red hair, but he man is a bastard for talking about their relationship the way he did.
No Diana was not a saint, but she was trapped. I don't agree with adultery but do you expect someone as young as she was and as pretty to live the rest of her life as a nun while her husband is off with Camilla?
2007-12-28 01:59:43 · answer #4 · answered by KM 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
And just how much have the people on here,who have bad mouthed her,done for the various charities that she headed?How many children,dying of AIDS have they comforted and held in their arms?How much have they done for the victims of land mines?Maybe she wasn't the saint that she wanted people to think she was but,in the time up to her death she did more good than any of her detractors here.To call a dead mother of two children a whore,is not only totally untrue but cowardly,she is not here to defend herself or her actions.Calling dead people names like that is unjustified,wrong and despicable.
2007-12-28 06:37:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I've never been a fan of Diana. She seemed to be more interested in what was good for Diana. But for all her faults, I do believe the time would have come when we would have seen the person she wished to be. She was human and she was flawed. Let's not be too quick to overlook the fact that she did have many fine qualities.
2007-12-27 20:54:04 · answer #6 · answered by Tira Misu 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I'm sure she was a nice person who loved children but people need to stop making her out to be a saint. She certainly wasn't. She was also bad tempered, poorly educated, and obsessed with her appearance.
2007-12-28 02:00:41 · answer #7 · answered by RoVale 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I loved princess Diana , everything about her, I thought she was a wonderful person!
EDIT: well obv i will get the thumbs down because im the only one not kissing the queens royal stuck up ***!!!!!
Diana was the only one who wasnt stuck up and she was the only one who brought what they were to light!!
May Angel Diana rest in peace!!- The peoples Princess
2007-12-27 20:30:11 · answer #8 · answered by ainey 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋
What a lot of rot you talk...She seemed to be a very nice person who loved people, and children. As for Prince Charles well he was the hypocrite, as well as two timing her even when they got married, to that frouzy woman. If anyone wanted the Title and what went with it she was the one.All she wants is the Crown on her head....guess what she will never get that. !!
2007-12-27 20:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I go along with Albert R on this, she was also a chameleon, she let you see what she wanted you to see, I did not like her, too sly for my taste.
2007-12-27 20:58:33 · answer #10 · answered by william s 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋