It is laughable that these clowns actually think they have any shot of winning over anybody. I am suprised that the extremist liberals are even supporting them. Why don't they understand that they are NEVER going to win the presidency again. Not in 2008, not in 2080! They lost. Opposing Bush and wanting to leave our troops without bullets and food was the last straw with the american people. I give them a 50% chance of being wiped out in 2008 and never coming back. And they think they can actually win? Ha! What fools. I can't wait for them to cry when their candidate, Hitlarly Criminalton gets 25% of the vote in 2008. This is going to be sweet, just one more year!
2007-12-27 11:02:36 · 16 answers · asked by gopaokay 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What's laughable is that you watched as two elections were stolen, attention was taken off the real culprit of 911, taxes were cut for the mutli-million & billionaires, and trillions were funneled to transnational corporations while the Bill of Rights and US Constitution were scrapped.
What's even more laughable is that you are totally complacent and seem to love the police state being built up around your big doe eyes. You're laughable, son.
What's even more laughable is you blame the Democrats for leaving them "without bullets". If only you had bothered to pick up a newspaper in the past 5 years you would see that it is so obviously the other way around. Why didn't Rumsfeld give them the proper body armor? You don't have an answer do you?
Summer Fleas> Um, I never denied the existence of Islamic terrorists or called anyone killers. Just like the typical sheep you can't be bothered with recognizing facts. You must make sh*t up. What a joke. -- You can't be serious! Pull your head outta the FOX box for 10 seconds, you poor brainwashed little girl. I honestly feel sorry for how truly misinformed you are. It's sad that you've let yourself be decieved so.
2007-12-27 11:07:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 5⤋
wow... your nuanced and articulate narrative would make Publius proud.
First, it's impossible to prove a negative, so your argument is fallacious on its face. Second, just as the Republican Party has seasoned, brilliant professionals with a vested interest in seeing it survive, so too does the Democratic Party. We have a winner-takes-all system in the US, that means that we are optimally designed for 2 major parties. While that doesn't necessitate the continued viability of either of the 2 major parties, to estimate ones sudden and epic demise at 50/50 is akin to me saying that I think Washington will likely secede in the near future, 50/50 chance.
In response to Mary Jo, what about the candidates makes them inadequate?
2007-12-27 19:39:41 · answer #2 · answered by Mark P 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
70 percent of the American electorate, as of July, 2007, believed that Bush/Cheney should be impeached.
William Jefferson Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating, the highest of any American president since World War II.
You really, really, need to learn to read. It's a useful skill.
2007-12-27 21:36:51 · answer #3 · answered by Silver 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are fooling yourself - people are sick of Bush's failed policies, and his disdain for working Americans. All the Republican candidates represent a continuatiuon of Bush's borrow-and-spend economics, his war, his racism, and his hypocrisy. THEY are the extremists, and their opposition to fiscal responsibility, maintaining the country's infrastructure, public education, and peace belies their fanaticism. The Democratic candidates are comparatively moderate, which heightens their appeal to the moderate and independent voters. The elitists had their chance to cash in - now the people of the United States deserve their turn...
2007-12-27 19:14:46 · answer #4 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
You're kidding, right? After the mess that the current simpleton has made and the damage he has done to the credibility of the Republican party (not to mention our nation's credibility with the rest of the world) I find it amazing that the republican candidates aren't so embarrassed that they rename the party. This answer isn't about supporting the democratic candidates, especially Hillary (she frightens me with some of her warped views of reality), but can you seriously think Bush has done anything but damage to the reputation of republicans?
2007-12-27 19:16:07 · answer #5 · answered by gwava0 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
That's ridiculous. In 2080 the Democrats might be the conservative party. You have no idea how politics works apparently.
2007-12-27 19:19:50 · answer #6 · answered by LookyHere 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
On the plus side, The republicans are unlikely to find a dumber candidate than the one they have in office now.
So, wouldn't that be a win-win anyway?
Either you get a smarter (by default) republican president or a democratic one.
Wonder how other places in the world live when they have more than two choices.
Edit: Wow, summer breeze is homophobic, how about that.
Love how two people getting married somehow makes other marriages less relevant.
2007-12-27 19:11:24 · answer #7 · answered by brettj666 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Wow... can I be the 15th person to sign on to the idea that you are wrong?
It seems like somebody "misunderestimated" us... (to use your Bush language)
If the answers to this question are any indication... you have your work cut out for you.
2007-12-27 19:22:45 · answer #8 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Look, ladies and gentlemen we have Karl Rove with us today. Hello Karl and welcome to YA Politics. Your one party system is akin to what one would expect in a Fascist dictatorship or a Communist dictatorship isn't that right? Of course it is. Well, Karl when the Democrats win by a landslide because your boy George and your pal Dickey have finished giving the GOP the worst reputation it has had since Warren Harding was President I would say expect a Democratic Landslide. But you already know that don't you and you are simply being funny and pulling our leg.
Well Karl, I know you have to go now so you take care and have a Happy Democratic New Year.
2007-12-27 19:08:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋
With the FIFTY scandals of the Bush Administration (that's right, I said FIFTY) it is a wonder we haven't thrown Bush out of office NOW. The administration that was promised is not the administration that was delivered, and the 70% disapproval rating of the administration, including disapproval by REPUBLICANS shows that you are not only wrong, but absurdly wrong. Want to find out for sure? Wait until November 2008.
2007-12-27 19:08:56 · answer #10 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋