Of course all we can go on is their symphonic views of terrorists but the way that all of the democratic candidates for president were so cheerful today seems like a good indicator that they had some kind of hand in the death of Bhutto. Would anyone really be suprised if Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama had something to do with this?
2007-12-27 10:39:41 · 19 answers · asked by gopaokay 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Her death would do more to further the Republican's agenda than the Democrat's agenda.
So if it were anyone it would be the fear-mongering Bush party!
However, I think it's actually the nutjobs in Pakistan who did this.
2007-12-27 10:44:29 · answer #1 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 10⤊ 3⤋
Has Bill Clinton been anywhere near Bhutto lately? If so maybe Hillary set the whole thing up. After all, Bhutto was way better looking than Hillary and had already been a President, 2 things that would have made Hillary jealous to the point of losing what little self-control she had left.
2007-12-27 18:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. This is far outreaching than our US politics. However, some I have spoken with today have again mentioned the Bilderberg Group. And Clinton has been reported to be a participant here. Google it.
If you want you can blame WJ CLinton as he let OBL go more times than anyone could imagine... as if he had alternative motives. Now in the New York Times Caucus Hillary is claiming her close associations to the late Bhutto. FOx news claims she won't capitialize on the death. Right !
Also Bill was backing Obama ... read the news links here
http://www.againsthillary.com
NEWS links no solicitation just shared information tu.
2007-12-27 18:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bhutto's death destabilizes Pakistan. That is to no American's benefit.
2007-12-27 18:48:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
More like a CIA plot gone wild. Typical rightwing dictatorship ploy. Kill the opposition and hang it on the terrorists. Then get the yayhoos to post this stupidity to try and hang it on the liberals.
Of course with the predeliction of the US government regardless of administration to side with right wing military governments over populist ones, It would not surprise me that theneo-cons are hawking this garbage.
2007-12-27 18:46:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, according to this article it was the fault of the BUsh administration.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1698562,00.html?xid=rss-topstories
Seriously, please tell me you don't actually think that Bush or Clinton or Obama had anything directly to do with Bhutto's assassination. This has got to be a joke. It's oddly egocentric.
2007-12-27 19:02:24 · answer #6 · answered by zero 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Are all Republicans demented? Is this something they train you in during the secret hate meetings?
2007-12-28 08:19:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now...I have no love for the Clintons or Obama and I'm sure they would not have anything to do with this.
But let's face it...Clinton and Obama are weak. They will look the other way when it comes to facing tough issues.
They are weak people...
When things were not going well in Iraq, Hillary shrank and sided with public sentiment. Can we really aford a leader like her to shrink in fear when things don't go well?
Think about it. It's not hard. Don't allow your emotions and pride to stand in the way of reason.
2007-12-27 18:44:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Grow up and get a life! People like you are a waste.
2007-12-28 00:07:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think that they had anything to do with her death. What they are excited about is that this is their chance to state their international views to the public to improve their image for president. They'll do anything for a vote.
2007-12-27 18:44:46 · answer #10 · answered by Ocean Soldier 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋