2007-12-27 09:33:52 · 9 answers · asked by Martin B 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
bitching...., I agree. I wish that I was at level two so, I could give you a thumbs up.
2007-12-27 09:43:21 · update #1
My worry is that, a limited regional nuclear exchange occurs, then the super powers get involved, take sides and then all hell breaks loose from there.
2007-12-27 09:46:40 · update #2
What I am suggesting is a cold war scenario similar to Korea, Vietnam or Afghanastan but, with nuclear weapons.
2007-12-27 09:50:14 · update #3
My fear is that a "limited" nuclear war, if there is such a thing, would spread fallout throughout the world. We here in the USA aren't immune to such a thing. There are a lot of crazies out there. I'm afraid we "ain't seen nutin yet".
2007-12-27 10:08:32 · answer #1 · answered by Nick Name 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily. There MAY be limited nuclear war if everything unravels, but almost all of the parties which could be involved possess only "theater" weapons of relatively short range. Of course, the worst scenario is a jihadist success in taking over pakistan, but as some of us have been discussing in other questions here, it's likely that will be largely prevented or stopped before it can progress very var.
The teminology of your question leads me to ask if you are one of the Christians who wants to see "Armageddon"?
You understand, i hope not, but that's yet a different discussion, eh?
2007-12-27 09:42:09 · answer #2 · answered by Der Lange 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pakistan isnt a threat. Pakistan is a huge ally of the US. If they would declare war against Pakistan, you are talking about a war against 3 muslim countries, with al qaeda. You are talking about a large amount of people 183,000,000 atleast, being in this area and this would be a dangerous situation. I just say don't do anything. This could turn into another Vietnam. The biggest fear is that they have Nucs which is very dangerous.
2007-12-27 10:52:48 · answer #3 · answered by evamclub 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every step in that direction is being caused by religious extremists. They have nuclear weapons that are at the current time in the hands of terriorists.
Those men are terriorists. They are so worried about Iran and they could care less what happens here. Your real threat is Pakistan and it always has been.
2007-12-27 09:42:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it necessarily is, although it certainly is destabilizing in a country and region that need stability more than more instability.
Perhaps it will have an opposite effect and strengthen those who supported and loved her, and perhaps in the end they will prevail.
I am a Christian. My heart goes out to this courageous and brilliant Muslim woman, who was a patriot and shining beacon of hope in a very darkened world. I can only hope the light will shine through in the end.
2007-12-27 10:19:07 · answer #5 · answered by Warren D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever wonder why Pakistan and not India?
When both were nuclear?
What is in common in all hot spots?
Look in the real world in the news.
Ever wonder what Judas were up to?
Ever wonder what is the mystery of "The King and I" ?
If the King has regal crown and landmark.
What does the " I " has?
If " I " was not the chosen one without the regal crown and landmark.
Wonder who is messing up "The King" ?
Luke 8.10,17
What do you think?
2007-12-27 19:27:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would answer that with the ? is Russias Sale of an Air Defense system to Iran a Push toward it.What is there to gain from either Action.
2007-12-27 09:41:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-12-27 10:08:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Very much so.
2007-12-27 09:41:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋