McCain, yes. The others, no.
2007-12-27 09:23:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by amazin'g 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
No, because if you want me to honest and no joking around. If either one should win, the first year will be wasted with them trying to under mind each other. Obama would have been better off if all were men. the reason I say this, They both draw a lot of attention simply because she is the first women to run, and he is the first black man. Hillary will slaughter him before this year is over .You don't mess with mother Hillary This thing going on in Pakistan will tell you a lot about Hillary and all the rest of the candidates. McCain yes , Biden I don't know a lot about him yet,. But he seem to knows what he talking about .You Know I am a Granny when I do research or too nosy one. But I still have time. Hope you get some good answer,
2007-12-27 09:54:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bee Bee 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
How much time does America have to squander to let a President come up to speed in dealing with world leaders?
How long a vacation will gangs bent on revenge to America take while a new President gets their house in order?
Whatever the party affiliation, make sure the candidate will skip the balls and parades, and start work right after the oath of office.
Isn't that how everyone else in America starts their first day of work?
2007-12-27 10:37:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by navymom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama will show the world that we are a diversified, tolerant nation. Not to mention intelligent (something the Bush adminstration has severly damaged). Having a black man with a "funny" sounding name as Pres will in all truth help our image and standing within the world community.
Hillary on the other hand could damage our relations with the Middle East even further. Many Middle Eastern countries unfortunately view women as inferior creating further tension if we elect a woman.
2007-12-27 09:56:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Taylor M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama is more diplomatic and I think people of other countries are going to be more apt to listen to him. But on the other hand, Hillary has known Bhutto for the past 12 years and has been good friends with her and probably learned a lot about Pakistan and how it runs and a lot of secretive things about the country being she was Prime Minister twice. That is if you were thinking about the Bhutto assasination. Truly, I think Obama would do better with other World leaders. He's far more affable.
2007-12-27 10:10:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
McCain seems like the only decent choice. The rest of the republican front runners aren't even republicans, they are democrats. No real republican would support abortion and increased gun control (Giuliani) or be in favour of high taxes, high crime, and high illegal immigration (Huckabee). Romney won't get the vote because his constituency is too bigoted to see past his religion. And Thompson and McCain have no idea how to run a campaign. I think, for the greater good, we are going to have to support Obama, because another Clinton in the White House will be just as bad, if not worse, than the democrat GOP front runners.
2007-12-27 09:34:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
it rather is going to be chaos in spite of who receives elected. Dubya has made quite useful that his successor is going to be completely f'd right into a hollow interior the floor. Out of the three, i've got gotta pass with Obama - yet i could wish that bill and Hillary could nicely be a element of it.
2016-10-02 10:35:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes to eiter Hillary or Obama. Or Biden. McCain is jsut a warmed over George Bush--which is the LAST thing America needs.
At least Hillary or Obama will talk to people, instead of trying to act like a know-it -all bully and who resorts to military force at every opportunity, without regard to the facts. And maybe tey won't make "allies" out of murgering dictators like Musharaf.
2007-12-27 09:25:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
I would like any of the Democratic candidates. I don't like any of the Republican candidates.
I would have voted for McCain if the Republicans would have nominated him while he was still sane (before he started pandering to the religious right).
2007-12-27 09:35:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Definitely not Hillary. What happened to Bhutto today should be a good indication about how well she'll be received telling the Muslim world how to behave. yeah, that'll go over well.
2007-12-27 09:29:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Karma 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
Hillary. She seems tougher.
2007-12-27 10:35:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by Misery 3
·
0⤊
0⤋