LeFevour is definatly a great player and has the ability to be a first day pick in the '10(?) draft. Especially coming from the MAC which never hurts as a QB. As far as Heisman, he may "technically" be a candidate going in top next season but his only legit crack at it will be his senior year. The good news for him is that I believe the team only has started 3 seniors so they are young and will continue to improve. It boils down to whether or not head coach Butch Jones stays or leaves for WV, as good a player as LeFevour is 3 head coaches in 3 years will be hard to overcome.
2007-12-27 09:47:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Prince 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The odds of a none BCS conference teams player winning the Heisman are very low.
A none BCS player is usually in the top 5 candidates but no matter how well they play, they will be too much doubt to make them the winner.
It is exactly like the teams they play for example: Hawaii they are the country's only undefeated team but they didn't get to go to the championships even though a two loss team did.
P.S. I am not saying Hawaii should be in the National title game I am just saying that they didn't face hard enough competition to legitimately prove they belonged.
2007-12-27 09:12:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by NCAAF Fan 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think he should be considered because he simply doesn't play in a tough conference. His situation is similar to that of Hawaii and Colt Brennan, as well as Central Florida's Kevin Smith. He may wind up having the most single-season rushing yards, yet he doesn't even finish in the top 5 of the Heisman voting.
2007-12-27 09:59:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
HAHA!!!! Tebow is the front runner. No one from Central Michigan has a shot.
2007-12-27 09:11:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Andy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
i do no longer think of Tebow could make it for the 2nd 12 months in a row and its in contrast to he's the main suitable QB available. i think of i could flow with Graham Harrell according to what in simple terms got here approximately in this night's activity.
2016-10-20 02:18:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because the voters only go for the big name players they would never vote for a guy on a team that lost to North Dakota State 44-14
2007-12-27 09:13:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by shut up and take your pants off 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt it. MAC players don't get the recognition that they deserve. He'd probably be a better NFL QB than a lot of the big names.
2007-12-27 09:17:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you're from Non-BCS conferences, you almost never have a chance.
Just ask Colt Brennan
2007-12-27 09:21:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I thought everyone says the Big10 is so weak? So it must not be anything special to put those numbers up last nite.
2007-12-27 09:16:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Your higher than my mother..
No
2007-12-27 09:03:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋