English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Didn't our founding fathers set out to protect us from a monarch. Why do people want to pass the presidency from bush to clinton to bush back to clinton, and no one see's a problem with this. Electing Hiliary is electing Bill... it is setting up the same special interest that were around 8 years ago. Doe anyone else see a problem with this...?

2007-12-27 07:53:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I'm not a hiliary slanderer i love seeing strong women... I'm also pretty liberal so this is fox news slander as it was called... I'm just saying do you all think it would be good... I don't!

2007-12-27 08:01:07 · update #1

9 answers

In a news conference Deanna Favre announced she will be the starting QB for the Packers Sunday. She claimed she is qualified to be starting QB because she has spent the past 16 years married to Brett while he played QB for the Packers. Because of this she understands how to pick up a corner blitz and knows the terminology of the Packers offense. A poll of Packers fans shows that 50% of those polled supported the move. Does this sounds idiotic and unbelievable to you? Yet Hillary Clinton makes the same claims as to why she is qualified to be President and 50% of democrats polled agreed.
Go Figure!

2007-12-27 07:58:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

No, but everyone is sleeping or paying bills.

The plan was designed by the Neocons to keep citizens looking the other way to "keep up with the joneses" and not doing anything about defending the Constitution. This is what four decades of fascist planning has done to this nation. The end result is fear of change.

The founding fathers had fought their way out of the same thing. They are turning over in their graves.

2007-12-27 07:58:11 · answer #2 · answered by HawkEye 5 · 1 2

If electing Hillary is electing the Bill that gave us record budget surpluses and many great initives that attempted to stop 9-11 before it happened (that Republicans partisanly blocked in the 90s) then I say bring on Hillary.

Can you see Huckabee as president? What is his experience and understanding of foreign policy? All he knows how to do is brag about his religion in Iowa.

2007-12-27 07:57:58 · answer #3 · answered by Zinger! 3 · 1 3

God no. After 8 years of Hillary we'll probably be looking at Jeb, then who, Chelsea, then one of the Bush Twins (I'm voting for Barbara, she hot!!)

2007-12-27 07:58:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

No. Hilary is too right wing but she is no Bush, nor is Bill. People should be able to vote as they want, term limits are undemocratic

2007-12-27 08:01:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If you actually were educated and KNEW what the candidates stood for, you'd know that Bill and Hillary have very different political stances. This sounds like Fox News slander. We have no good dirt on Hillary, so we'll just say she's the same person as Bill.

2007-12-27 07:57:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

No, it's not a monarchy. We're talking about two different families. If you really have a problem with this, then support Obama.

2007-12-27 07:58:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The neocons love Billary.

The rEVO_|ution is now.

2007-12-27 08:08:10 · answer #8 · answered by doug4jets 7 · 1 1

Yikes. No I don't want Hillary in the White House. That would be the worst case scenario!

2007-12-27 07:56:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers