Did they get the Yahoo Answers political leaders too? 7 out of 10 have not been seen lately.
2007-12-27 06:59:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
al qaida,
2007-12-27 07:02:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Even if the assassin had nothing to do with either one, both Musharraf and al-Qaeda/bin Laden can be called indirect co-conspirators. Whatever Mrs. Bhutto may have done that was unlawful while Prime Minister, it never brought the kind of harm that Musharraf and al-Qaeda have brought to that country alone.
2007-12-27 15:13:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally I think it was Al Qaeda. They had more to gain from her death. Think about it. Musharraf wants stability and strength, while all this did was create chaos and instability. Now I could be wrong but right now all the signs point to Al Qaeda.
2007-12-27 15:08:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I believe it was Bin laden behind it; Pakistan has nukes. They want to destabilize an already weak country to expolit it to their advantage.
2007-12-27 15:12:01 · answer #4 · answered by Crystal S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why does it have to either? Why not the 1 fanatic with the gun and the bomb?
2007-12-27 15:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by booman17 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I honestly don't think we'll ever find out. But, I'd say Musharaff was/is behind it!
2007-12-27 15:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well,Bhutto herself wanted to fight Al-Qaeda and other radicals. So,I think Al-Qaeda did it.
2007-12-27 15:04:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Someone in Pakistan
2007-12-27 15:04:29 · answer #8 · answered by crazy2all 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I believe it was a suicide bomber.
2007-12-27 15:03:08 · answer #9 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
CIA
2007-12-27 15:29:31 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋