true or false
2007-12-27 05:47:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
It was a dictatorship, and a bloodthirsty one at that.
Your premise is totally false.
2007-12-27 06:01:06 · answer #1 · answered by bgee2001ca 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
False. The Holy Roman Empire was very unstable and too big for any one person to rule it "absolutely." Most people payed no attention to the Holy Roman Emperor. King Louis XIV was probably the first to really succeed at creating an absolute monarchy.
2007-12-27 16:00:23 · answer #2 · answered by illustrator 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False as it was not Roman, Holy or an Empire, let alone unified and absolutist.
2007-12-27 15:01:36 · answer #3 · answered by tiger 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
False.
2007-12-27 13:58:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a loose confederation of essentially independent states, each with their own laws and rulers.
2007-12-27 16:17:58 · answer #5 · answered by bonzo_dog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋