She was killed. Her life is gone.
Why pick her apart? Is it to justify her murder? Isn't the murder of a woman just that no matter anything else?
2007-12-27 05:36:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It may be due to people pinning their hopes on her to do something good in Pakistan. She was a corrupt leader. As Prime Minister she stole billions from the Pakistani people. Three separate countries produced documents showing multiple bank accounts.
If it were only Pakistan officials accusing her I'd be skeptical. When Switzerland steps up with documents, that pretty much is the smoking gun to me.
It is sad that she was killed and hopefully all involved will be brought to justice.
2007-12-27 05:41:16 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She was not corrupt. These sort allegations come as a part and parcel of being a politician in Pakistan. She was a great leader. Nobody in Pakistan can match the calibre and stature of Benazir Bhutto. She was a great person. May she rest in peace.
2007-12-27 06:36:14 · answer #2 · answered by VK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. This, unfortunately, is the way of Humankind. No matter what they say, mankind is a PACK animal, and like wolves, they think they need to tear people apart.
Unfortunately, mankind is also like crabs in a bucket; if someone is succeeding in escaping, they will be pulled back down. In olden days, an intelligent human who tried to better things was killed (Socrates, Gallelio, Columbus...) Nowadays, they are called politically incorrect (Agnew and others like him), destroying their career.
ALL politicians are corrupt; think of the connotation of politician! Many despots lift their country out of quagmires (think Napoleon, et al); all should be remembered for their good deeds.
2007-12-27 05:46:00 · answer #3 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems faintly relevant to find out. Those ignorant of history are bound to repeat it. It won't serve to justify her death, but perhaps it would help understand whether she had a hand in the demise of democracy in Pakistan, as even some close to her have claimed.
2007-12-27 06:00:22 · answer #4 · answered by Dirk D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she was not corrupt leader, military dictatorship accused her, but, there was no evidence about corruption. the main reason is secularism and reformism which was started by Bhutto
2007-12-27 06:06:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sad thing is that her death won't help bring peace to the region, but more violence.
2007-12-27 05:48:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
like bhutto was ever a household word ..before the terror attack
2007-12-27 05:49:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋